The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss
David Faraggi, Noya Galai, Anne M Lynch, Sunni L Mumford, Neil J Perkins, Enrique F Schisterman, Karen C Schliep, Robert M Silver, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Luchin Wong, Aijun Ye, Janet M Townsend
Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.ROR
We sought to assess the relationship between a short interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a pregnancy loss and subsequent live birth and pregnancy outcomes.
Study Design
A secondary analysis of women enrolled in the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial with a human chorionic gonadotropin-positive pregnancy test and whose last reproductive outcome was a loss were included in this analysis (n = 677). IPI was defined as the time between last pregnancy loss and last menstrual period of the current pregnancy and categorized by 3-month intervals. Pregnancy outcomes include live birth, pregnancy loss, and any pregnancy complications. These were compared between IPI groups using multivariate relative risk estimation by Poisson regression.
Results
Demographic characteristics were similar between IPI groups. The mean gestational age of prior pregnancy loss was 8.6 ± 2.8 weeks. The overall live birth rate was 76.5%, with similar live birth rates between those with IPI ≤3 months as compared to IPI >3 months (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.16). Rates were also similar for periimplantation loss (aRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.51-1.80), clinically confirmed loss (aRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51-1.10), and any pregnancy complication (aRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.09) for those with IPI ≤3 months as compared to IPI >3 months.
Conclusion
Live birth rates and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy loss, were not associated with a very short IPI after a prior pregnancy loss. The traditional recommendation to wait at least 3 months after a pregnancy loss before attempting a new pregnancy may not be warranted.
interpregnancy interval pregnancy loss, short interval after miscarriage outcomes, EAGeR trial interpregnancy spacing, pregnancy loss subsequent live birth, conception timing after miscarriage, interpregnancy interval complications, rapid reconception after loss, pregnancy spacing fertility outcomes, miscarriage recovery conception timing
PMID 25246378 25246378 DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020
Cite this article
Wong, L. F., Schliep, K. C., Silver, R. M., Mumford, S. L., Perkins, N. J., Ye, A., Galai, N., Wactawski-Wende, J., Lynch, A. M., Townsend, J. M., Faraggi, D., & Schisterman, E. F. (2015). The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss. *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, *212*(3), 375.e1-375.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020
Wong LF, Schliep KC, Silver RM, Mumford SL, Perkins NJ, Ye A, et al. The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):375.e1-375.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020
Wong, L. F., et al. "The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss." *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, vol. 212, no. 3, 2015, pp. 375.e1-375.e11.
Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay tre...
Schliep KC et al., 2022Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
STUDY Question: What is the association between perceived stress during peri-conception and early pregnancy and pregnancy loss among women who have experienced a prior pregnancy loss?
SUMMARY ANSWER:...
Sanders JN et al., 2022
Open Access
Reproductive Health
Background: In vitro fertilization (IVF) births contribute to a considerable proportion of preterm birth (PTB) each year. However, there is no formal surveillance of adverse perinatal outcomes for les...
Kuroda K et al., 2021
Open Access
Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Purpose: Does the OPtimization of Thyroid function, Thrombophilia, Immunity, and Uterine Milieu (OPTIMUM) treatment strategy, developed for treating repeated implantation failure (RIF), contribute to ...