Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss

  • Baylor College of Medicine ROR
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis ROR
  • University of Indianapolis ROR
  • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA ROR

Cureus, 15(4), e37884

DOI 10.7759/cureus.37884 PMID 37214013

Abstract

Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay treatment and worsen outcomes. Screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detect complicated grief poorly, and specific tools for prolonged or complicated grief after a reproductive loss are cumbersome. In this study, a five-item questionnaire to detect complicated grief after reproductive loss of any type was designed and preliminary validated. Methods A questionnaire patterned after the extensively validated Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) was created by a group of physicians and lay advocates to employ non-traumatic but specific language related to grief after miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. One hundred and forty women at a large academic center were recruited in person and via social media to validate the questionnaire with well-studied instruments for anxiety (7-item Panic Disorder Severity Scale, PDSS), trauma (22-item Impact of Events Scale), and reproductive grief and depressive symptoms (33-item Perinatal Grief Scale [PGS]). Results The response rate was 74.9%. Of the 140 participants, 18 (12.8%) experienced their loss during high-risk pregnancies, and 65 (46.4%) were recruited via social media. Seventy-one (51%) respondents had a score > 4, a positive screen for the BGQ. On average, women experienced their loss 2 years prior to participation (IQR 1-5 years). Cronbach's alpha was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83). The goodness of fit indices of the model met Fornell and Larker criteria (RMSEA = 0.167, CFI = 0.89, SRMR = 0.06). The AVE was 0.42 and the CR 0.78. Conclusions This investigator-created screening tool is internally consistent and meets preliminary criteria for discriminant validity. This tool can be refined prior to testing for sensitivity and specificity in screening for complicated grief after a reproductive loss.

Topics

complicated grief reproductive loss, miscarriage grief assessment, stillbirth bereavement, pregnancy loss grief scale, neonatal death grief, perinatal grief measurement, grief validation instrument, selective reduction grief, infertility related grief, pregnancy loss psychological impact
PMID 37214013 37214013 DOI 10.7759/cureus.37884 10.7759/cureus.37884

Cite this article

Cara Buskmiller, Grauerholz, K. R., Bute, J., Brann, M., Fredenburg, M., & Refuerzo, J. S. (2023). Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss. *Cureus*, *15*(4), e37884. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37884

Related articles