Prospective pregnancy study designs for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicants
Germaine M. Buck Louis, Courtney D Lynch, Laura A Schieve, Joseph B Stanford, Anne Sweeney, Germaine M Buck, John C Rockett, Steven M Schrader, Sherry G Selevan
United States Department of Health and Human ServicesROR
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health/DHHS, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 7B03, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. gb156i@nih.gov
The determinants of successful human reproduction and development may act as early as periconceptionally, underscoring the need to capture exposures during these critical windows when assessing potential toxicants. To identify such toxicants, couples must be studied longitudinally prior to conception without regard to a couple's ability to ascertain a clinically recognized pregnancy. We examined the utility and feasibility of prospective pregnancy study designs by conducting a systematic review of the literature to summarize relevant information regarding the planning, implementation, and success of previously published prospective pregnancy studies. Information concerning design elements and participation was abstracted from 15 eligible studies (from a total of 20 identified studies) using a standardized form. The primary author of each study was contacted to review our summary of their work and obtain missing information. Our findings confirm the ability to recruit women/couples from diverse populations using a variety of recruitment strategies. Among the studies we reviewed, 4-97% of eligible individuals were successfully contacted, with enrollment rates ranging from 42 to 100%. Length of follow-up varied from 3 to 12 months. A high percentage of women provided urine (57-98%) and blood (86-91%) specimens and most male partners (94-100%) provided semen samples. These data support the feasibility of this design.
prospective pregnancy study design, reproductive toxicant assessment, periconceptional exposure measurement, developmental toxicology, preconception cohort methodology, early pregnancy loss detection, environmental reproductive hazards, systematic review pregnancy design, conception to birth monitoring, critical window exposure
PMID 14698935 14698935 DOI 10.1289/ehp.6262 10.1289/ehp.6262
Cite this article
Buck, G. M., Lynch, C. D., Stanford, J. B., Sweeney, A. M., Schieve, L. A., Rockett, J. C., Selevan, S. G., & Schrader, S. M. (2004). Prospective pregnancy study designs for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicants. *Environmental health perspectives*, *112*(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6262
Buck GM, Lynch CD, Stanford JB, Sweeney AM, Schieve LA, Rockett JC, et al. Prospective pregnancy study designs for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicants. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(1):79-86. doi:10.1289/ehp.6262
Buck, G. M., et al. "Prospective pregnancy study designs for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicants." *Environmental health perspectives*, vol. 112, no. 1, 2004, pp. 79-86.
Schisterman EF et al., 2013Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
Background: Low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been proposed to improve pregnancy outcomes in couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss. However, results from studies of LDA on pregnancy outcomes have bee...
Neubert D et al., 1986
Open Access
Environmental Health Perspectives
Examples of a combined approach using in vivo as well as in vitro methods for the assessment of prenatal toxicity are presented. The topics discussed include the analysis of the possible embryotoxic p...
IMPORTANCE: Because analytic technologies improve, increasing amounts of data on methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and unassisted conceptions are available. Howeve...
Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay tre...