Patients with premenstrual syndrome recorded their symptoms daily using menstrual distress questionnaires. These were analysed by a least mean square method of fitting sine waves. After recording an untreated cycle, patients were given progesterone 200 mg b.d. and placebo in a double-blind crossover manner; 75 per cent of patients were then given progesterone 400 mg b.d. and placebo in a similar manner. Treated cycles were rated by both daily menstrual distress questionnaires and retrospective self-assessment. Both rating methods showed there was no significant difference between progesterone and placebo in reducing symptoms of premenstrual syndrome, and in the majority of cases placebo was more effective, although never significantly so.
PMID 385093 385093 DOI 10.1192/bjp.135.3.209 10.1192/bjp.135.3.209
Cite this article
Sampson, G. A. (1979). Premenstrual syndrome: a double-blind controlled trial of progesterone and placebo. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 135(3), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.135.3.209
Sampson GA. Premenstrual syndrome: a double-blind controlled trial of progesterone and placebo. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;135(3):209-215. doi:10.1192/bjp.135.3.209
Sampson, Gwyneth A. "Premenstrual syndrome: a double-blind controlled trial of progesterone and placebo." The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, vol. 135, no. 3, 1979, pp. 209-215.
Keywords
Adult, Clinical Trials As Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Placebos, Premenstrual Syndrome/drug Therapy/psychology, Progesterone/therapeutic Use, Surveys and Questionnaires, Placebos, Progesterone
To determine the efficacy of L-carnitine therapy in selected cases of male factor infertility.
Placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial.
University tertiary referral center. One hundred infertile patients (ages 20-40 years) with the following baseline concentration, 10-20 x 10(6)/mL; total motility, 10%-30%; forward motility, <15%; atypical forms, <70%; velocity, 10-30 micro/s; linearity, <4. Eighty-six patients completed the study. Patients underwent L-carnitine therapy 2 g/day or placebo; the study design was 2 months of washout, 2 months of therapy/placebo, 2 months of washout, and 2 months placebo/therapy. Variation in sperm parameters used in the patients selection criteria, in particular, sperm motility. Excluding outliers, a statistically significant improvement in semen quality, greater than after the placebo cycle, was seen after the L-carnitine therapy for sperm concentration and total and forward sperm motility. The increase in forward sperm motility was more significant in those patients with lower initial values, i.e., <5 x 10(6) or <2 x 10(6) of forward motile sperm/ejaculate or sperm/mL. Based on a controlled study of efficacy, L-carnitine therapy was effective in increasing semen quality, especially in groups with lower baseline levels. However, these results need to be confirmed by larger clinical trials and in vitro studies.
Although its etiology is unknown, it has been hypothesized that premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is linked to a deficiency of central serotoninergic activity. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of fluoxetine, a specific serotonin uptake inhibitor, on PMS symptoms. Following extensive screening, including several psychological inventories, eight women with severe persistent PMS participated in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study which included three months each of daily fluoxetine 20 mg or placebo, administered in a randomized order. Symptoms were evaluated using the Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences and other psychometric measures. Compared with placebo, treatment with fluoxetine was associated with an improvement in PMS symptoms as judged by highly significant decreases in behavioral (P less than .005), physical (P less than .05), and total (P less than .005) Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences scores; Beck Depression Inventory scores (P less than .005); Profile of Mood States subscales scores including depression (P less than .005), tension (P less than .005), and anger (P less than .01); and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores. The use of fluoxetine was associated with a greater mean reduction in behavioral (75%) than in physical scores (40%), with a mean decrease in total Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences scores of 62%, which rendered these scores similar to follicular phase values. Thus, the luteal phase symptomatology of PMS was effectively abolished. At this dose, no significant side effects or complications were noted during treatment. Fluoxetine appears to be a highly effective, well-tolerated treatment for the psychological and physical symptoms accompanying severe PMS.
The authors studied the effects of clonidine on a subgroup of women who had symptoms associated with premenstrual syndrome; the subgroup comprised 24 women aged 19 to 41 years who had "moderate" to "severe" cyclic decreases in beta-endorphin levels. All of the women received clonidine and placebo in a double-blind cross-over design that spanned four menstrual cycles. Clonidine was significantly (p less than .05) more effective than placebo in reducing symptoms.
Rigorous criteria were used to select women with severe premenstrual syndrome for inclusion in an 8-month double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of progesterone vaginal suppositories. Following a control month without treatment, progesterone (200 mg in polyethylene glycol base) or placebo was self administered twice daily by vaginal suppository for a minimum of 12 days before the onset of menstruation for 3 months. Crossover to the opposite medication for a further 3 months was followed by a final control cycle without treatment in month 8. Physician contact was minimized throughout the study to avoid any possible positive effects of psychological support which may have confounded past investigations. Detailed self-report questionnaires were completed every 3 days for the duration of the study. Although the attrition rate was high, 20 women completed the trial and their records are analyzed here. The results of this trial indicate that the response to vaginal progesterone in these dosages is, at best, marginal and not significantly different from response with placebo use.