Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.ROR
DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000238 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000238
Cite this article
Schliep, K. C., Mumford, S. L., Vladutiu, C. J., Ahrens, K. A., Perkins, N. J., Sjaarda, L. A., Kissell, K. A., Prasad, A., Wactawski-Wende, J., & Schisterman, E. F. (n.d.). Perceived stress, reproductive hormones, and ovulatory function: a prospective cohort study.
Schliep KC, Mumford SL, Vladutiu CJ, Ahrens KA, Perkins NJ, Sjaarda LA, et al. Perceived stress, reproductive hormones, and ovulatory function: a prospective cohort study.
Schliep, K. C., et al. Perceived stress, reproductive hormones, and ovulatory function: a prospective cohort study.
The topic of how the menstrual cycle is a vital sign which could signal pathophysiologic process has received considerable attention in the past decade. The current recommendations of various academic groups will be discussed as well as the FertilityTMM Care method of charting and the Naprotechnology approach to evaluating abnormalities of the menstrual cycle. Two clinical scenarios seen in adolescent medicine, PCOS and AUB, will be analyzed looking at the pathophysiology of these clinical scenarios and their management. The approach will be one that conducts an evaluation to try to find the underlying problem and aims to restore the normal physiology of the menstrual cycle.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the New York Academy of Sciences have published academic statements during the past ten years emphasizing the need for providers to teach patients how to chart and the important clinical ramifications of using this charting as a vital sign. In 2006 the American Academy of Pediatrics published in the Pediatrics Journal a "Menstruation Using the Menstrual Sign as a Vital Sign." In 2015, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology published a Committee Opinion emphasizing the need to teach women the charting of their menses and the important pathophysiologic process that could be detected with the charting.
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD), while commonly observed and managed in stimulated in-vitro fertilisation cycles, is a more contentious phenomenon in natural cycles. The challenge arises in the definition and diagnosis of LPD. Controversy regarding the clinical significance of LPD is due in part to the lack of a reliable test to diagnose the disorder.2 Jones first described LPD based on temperature criteria, urinary pregnanediol studies and histological appearance of the endometrium in 1949. 3 In current practice, timing of the luteal phase from which an evaluation of its length and hormonal parameters can be made are problematic. Ovulation and thereby the length of the luteal phase can reliably and reproducibly be determined by teaching women to identify their Peak Symptom Day (PSD) of cervical mucus (the last day of any mucus discharge that is clear, stretchy, or lubricative). 4 There is an abrupt and dramatic change in the characteristic fertile pattern of pre-ovulatory mucus that is due to the effects of progesterone post-ovulation. Correlation with ultrasound and hormonal evaluation indicates that the mucus observation occurs within 2 days of ovulation. Using such a fertility awareness based method, the American Academy of Fertility Care Professionals has defined a luteal phase deficiency as a deficiency in the length of the luteal phase, or a deficiency of the hormones progesterone and oestradiol that occurs during the luteal phase. Women presenting with infertility or recurrent miscarriages to the Fertility Assessment and Research Clinic of the Mater Mothers' Hospital (Brisbane, Australia) were instructed in the Sympto-Thermal Method. This allowed for accurate documentation of ovulation and the luteal phase. Luteal phase hormone levels were collected 5, 7 and 9 days after ovulation. Women were allocated a luteal phase status using the definition below for luteal phase defect. This data is part of the recruitment phase of the Pregnancy Achieving Trials (Mater Health Services HREC no. 1618M). By the definition above, a luteal phase deficiency exists in 36% (100) of 279 infertile couples who presented to our clinic, in preparation for involvement in the Pregnancy Achieving Trials. Of 16 infertile women who had previously experienced both a miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy, 75% (12) met the criteria for a luteal phase deficiency. Ectopic pregnancy is known to be associated with infectious history, smoking, age, previous spontaneous miscarriage, history of infertility, previous use of an intrauterine device and prior history of medical termination of pregnancy (mifepristone + misoprostol). Previous research has suggested an association between luteal phase defect (LPD) and ectopic pregnancy in subfertile couples." All stimulated cycles of in-vitro fertilisation have abnormal luteal phases.' There exists a high rate of ectopic pregnancy among women undergoing in-vitro fertilization. The high proportion of ectopic pregnancies among women who fall pregnant on progestogen-only contraceptives also suggests an hormonal association." Women who are heavy smokers, another risk factor associated with ectopic pregnancy, has been shown to have lower urinary progesterone metabolite levels in the luteal phase compared with non-smokers. 10 There appears to be an association between prior miscarriage, prior ectopic pregnancy and luteal phase deficiency in subfertile couples. Could luteal phase deficiency, an hormonal disorder, be useful in the definition of ectopic pregnancy risk?