To estimate patient preferences insofar as the cosmetic appeal of abdominal incisions used for hysterectomy. We hypothesized that the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) incision would be preferred cosmetically to traditional multiport laparoscopic incisions and open abdominal incisions via Pfannenstiel, vertical midline, or horizontal mini-laparotomy.
Design
Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting
Two gynecology clinics at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina.
Patients
Seventy-three women including 50 consecutive women from a private specialty clinic and 23 consecutive women from a resident indigent care clinic.
Interventions
A brief questionnaire was distributed that assessed preferences via ranking and by using a visual analog scale. Patients were also asked to rate the importance of 4 factors in their decision making: size, location, and number of incisions, and perceived recovery time. Descriptive statistics, t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and χ(2) tests were used to compare continuous or categorical values. MEASUREMENTS AND
Main Results
Overall, the LESS incision was the most preferred incision according to most common choice and visual analog scale scores. In the private clinic, the LESS incision was preferred most often, with 53% of women (39/73) ranking it as their first choice. In the resident clinic, the horizontal mini-laparotomy incision was preferred most often, with 27% of women (20/73) ranking it their first choice. Neither the demographic factors nor any of the factors in decision making explained the difference between the clinics.
Conclusion
The LESS incision was most preferred in this study. However, the horizontal mini-laparotomy incision and the traditional laparoscopic with low lateral incisions were also highly preferred. Patient perception of the "visibility" of abdominal incisions may be the distinguishing issue to explain the difference in the preferences between the clinics and the differences between the present study and previously published studies of cosmetic preferences.
laparoendoscopic single site surgery cosmesis patient preference, LESS incision cosmetic preference gynecologic surgery, abdominal incision cosmetic outcomes hysterectomy, patient preference minimally invasive gynecologic surgery incisions, Pfannenstiel versus laparoscopic incision cosmetic appeal, mini-laparotomy cosmetic preference women gynecology, surgical scar cosmesis visual analog scale gynecology, single port laparoscopy patient satisfaction cosmesis, Yeung gynecologic surgery incision preference study, multiport versus single site laparoscopic incision preference
PMID 23312246 23312246 DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008
Cite this article
Yeung PP Jr, Bolden, C. R., Westreich, D., & Sobolewski, C. (2013). Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. *Journal of minimally invasive gynecology*, *20*(1), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008
Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):79-84. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008
Yeung PP Jr, et al. "Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery." *Journal of minimally invasive gynecology*, vol. 20, no. 1, 2013, pp. 79-84.
Neutens S et al., 2026Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study whether bilateral nonpatency of fallopian tubes is correlated with a lower recurrence rate of endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective 2:1 matched case-control study. SETTING: Un...
Bardet L et al., 2024Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
STUDY Objective: To compare outcomes of vaginal surgery in women with moderate or severe symptomatic cesarean scar defect (with or without residual myometrium).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Set...
Whittaker NM, AAGL 2024Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
No standard criteria exist for how to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy. This case series provides evidence of the importance of standardized, reproducible techniques. A single non-oncologic gynecologi...
Huang D et al., 2023Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Objective: To present a case of concurrent uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and isthmocele, treated with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAC) embolization of the AVM followed by robotic ist...