To assess the sensitivity and specificity of common clinical tests used for the diagnosis of luteal phase defect (LPD).
Design
The sensitivity and specificity of these tests for predicting low integrated P levels over the luteal phase were calculated.
Setting
Outpatient reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic at a university medical center.
Patients
Fifty-eight strictly defined normal women were used to determine normal integrated luteal phase P levels. The study population was a separate 34 women who either were normal (n = 15) or were being evaluated for infertility or recurrent abortion (n = 19). These 34 study subjects all had the following tests performed in the same menstrual cycle: daily reproductive hormone levels, daily assessment of preovulatory follicle size, late luteal endometrial biopsies, and BBT charts.
Main Outcome Measures
Basal body temperature, maximum preovulatory follicle size, dated endometrial biopsies, and serum P levels (single and multiple) were used in an attempt to predict which patients had low integrated P levels.
Results
Unacceptably low sensitivity and/or specificity levels were found for the following tests: appearance of BBT charts, luteal phase length, and preovulatory follicle diameter. Timed endometrial biopsy was found to have marginally acceptable sensitivity and specificity levels whether dated by next menstrual period or midcycle events. The best test for the prediction of low integrated P was a single serum P level from the midluteal phase that was < 10 ng/mL (31.8 nmol/L) or a sum of three random serum P measurements that was < 30 ng/mL (95.4 nmol/L) (also obtained in the midluteal phase).
Conclusions
Luteal phase defect is a relatively uncommon but important cause of infertility and/or habitual abortion. The recommended test for the determination of LPD is a midluteal phase single serum P level < 10 ng/mL or the sum of three serum P levels that is < 30 ng/mL. The endometrial biopsy is a second line test that is only recommended when LPD needs to be evaluated in a treated cycle (ovulation induction or supplemental P).
luteal phase defect diagnostic sensitivity specificity clinical tests, midluteal progesterone level prediction luteal phase defect, endometrial biopsy sensitivity specificity luteal phase defect, integrated progesterone luteal phase diagnostic threshold, BBT chart luteal phase defect detection accuracy, preovulatory follicle size luteal function prediction, single progesterone less than 10 ng/mL luteal phase defect, sum three progesterone measurements 30 ng/mL luteal defect, Jordan Soules luteal phase defect diagnostic methods comparison, recurrent abortion luteal phase defect progesterone testing, endometrial biopsy dating next menses vs midcycle LH surge
PMID 8005304 8005304 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56815-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56815-0
Cite this article
Jordan, J., Craig, K., Clifton, D. K., & Soules, M. R. (1994). Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use. *Fertility and sterility*, *62*(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56815-0
Jordan J, Craig K, Clifton DK, Soules MR. Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(1):54-62. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56815-0
Jordan, J., et al. "Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 62, no. 1, 1994, pp. 54-62.
Objective: To examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.
Design: Retrospect...
Infertility > Assisted Reproductive Technology > IVF OutcomesPregnancy > Neonatal Outcomes > Birth Weight and Gestational AgeContraception/Comparison > ART vs Natural Conception > Sibling Studies
Objective: Disordered eating behaviors may impact the gynecologic health of adolescents through effects on menstrual cycle function and body size; however, few studies have evaluated these association...