Reply of the authors: "Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"" by Frank-Herrmann et al

  • University of Pennsylvania ROR
  • Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. ROR
  • University of Utah ROR
  • Tennessee Department of Education ROR
  • Radiant Research (United States) ROR
  • University of British Columbia ROR

Fertility and sterility, 125(1), 180

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029 PMID 41475701 Source

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

restorative reproductive medicine reproductive autonomy informed consent, Peipert BJ fertility awareness method education debate, reproductive choice family planning informed consent ethical considerations, body literacy education reproductive health decision-making, fertility awareness-based methods clinical practice guidelines, informed consent fertility treatment options comparison, reproductive autonomy natural family planning methods, fertility education medical training curriculum
PMID 41475701 41475701 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.029

Cite this article

Stanford, J. B., Parnell, T. A., & Minjeur, M. (2026). *Response to "The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent"*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.014

Related articles