A progesterone solution was administered by intravaginal instillation, intramuscular injection, and sublingually to estrogen-deficient women, with or without estradiol (E2) replacement, and serum progesterone (P) concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Intravaginal application to postmenopausal subjects receiving E2 gave the highest values of serum P: 10 times baseline at 15 minutes and 30 to 40 times at 1 to 2 hours, with sustained levels, for 7 hours and decline to 10 times baseline at 24 hours. Intravaginal application to hypoestrogenic women gave similar results, but of much lower magnitude (highest value, 20 times baseline). Intramuscular injection, in contradistinction, showed gradually increasing levels over the study period, up to 30 times basal values at 24 hours. It contrast, sublingual application produced very modest serum increases, to approximately 10 times baseline within 2 hours and return to basal value at 24 hours. Since the most rapid and highest levels were observed by vaginal application to postmenopausal women receiving estrogen, and considering that the vagina has been similarly shown to be very effective for estrogen absorption, it is conceived that full hormone replacement could be accomplished in the deficient states by cyclic vaginal application of both steroids.
PMID 7215569 7215569 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45439-7 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45439-7
Cite this article
Villanueva, B., Casper, R. F., & Yen, S. S. (1981). Intravaginal administration of progesterone: enhanced absorption after estrogen treatment. Fertility and sterility, 35(4), 433-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45439-7
Villanueva B, Casper RF, Yen SS. Intravaginal administration of progesterone: enhanced absorption after estrogen treatment. Fertil Steril. 1981;35(4):433-437. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45439-7
Villanueva, B., et al. "Intravaginal administration of progesterone: enhanced absorption after estrogen treatment." Fertility and sterility, vol. 35, no. 4, 1981, pp. 433-437.
To compare the efficacy of Crinone 8% intravaginal progesterone gel vs. IM progesterone for luteal phase and early pregnancy support after IVF-ET. Randomized, open-label study. Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Two hundred and one women undergoing IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomized to supplementation with Crinone 8% (90 mg once daily) or IM progesterone (50 mg once daily) beginning the day after oocyte retrieval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy, embryo implantation, and live birth rates. RESULT(S): The women randomized to luteal phase supplementation with IM progesterone had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (48.5% vs. 30.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 3.87), embryo implantation (24.1% vs. 17.5%; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08, 3.30), and live birth rates (39.4% vs. 24.5%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.70) than women randomized to Crinone 8%. CONCLUSION(S): In women undergoing IVF-ET, once-a-day progesterone supplementation with Crinone 8%, beginning the day after oocyte retrieval, resulted in significantly lower embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates compared with women supplemented with IM progesterone.
InfertilityLuteal Phase SupportRoute of AdministrationIVF Protocols
To evaluate the efficacy of oral micronized progesterone compared with IM progesterone in oil for luteal support in patients undergoing IVF who are treated with a GnRH agonist. Randomized prospective clinical trial. University-based IVF center. PATIENT(S): Women <40 years of age who were undergoing IVF with luteal GnRH pituitary down-regulation. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive either oral micronized progesterone (200 mg three times daily) or IM progesterone (50 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Progesterone levels at standardized days 21 and 28, and pregnancy and embryo implantation rates. RESULT(S): Day 21 progesterone levels were 77.6+/-13.2 ng/mL in the IM group and 81.5+/-16.2 ng/mL in the oral group. Day 28 progesterone levels were 76.3+/-15.0 ng/mL in the IM group and 53.6+/-10.1 ng/mL in the oral group. The clinical pregnancy rates were 57.9% and 45.8% for the IM and oral groups, respectively. The implantation rate per embryo was significantly higher in the IM group (40.9%) than in the oral group (18.1%). CONCLUSION(S): When used according to our protocols, oral progesterone and IM progesterone result in comparable levels of circulating progesterone. However, oral progesterone results in a reduced implantation rate per embryo.
Reproductive EndocrinologyPharmacokineticsRoute of AdministrationProgesterone Formulations
To examine the effects of food ingestion and administered dose on the absorption of oral micronized P (Utrogestan; Besins-Iscovesco, Paris, France) and to compare the bioavailability of intramuscular versus oral routes of administration. Prospective, randomized, open label crossover protocol with 7 days between dosages. Academic institution. Fifteen normal postmenopausal women. All subjects participated [1] micronized P (200 mg) or placebo under fasting or nonfasting conditions once daily for 5 days; [2] micronized P (100, 200, or 300 mg) once daily under fasting conditions for 5 days; and [3] micronized P (200 mg) or intramuscular P (50 mg in oil) administered once daily for 2 days. Serum P concentrations were measured in all groups. Concomitant food ingestion increased the area under the serum P concentration versus time curve (AUC0 to 24) and the maximum serum P concentration (Cmax) without affecting time to maximum serum concentration (Tmax) (P < 0.05). Micronized P absorption and elimination were first-order processes and exhibited dose-independent pharmacokinetics between 100 and 300 mg. After intramuscular P, Cmax was higher and Tmax occurred later compared with the oral P preparation. Oral P had lower relative bioavailability (8.6%) than intramuscular P. Absorption of micronized P was enhanced twofold in the presence of food. Both absorption and elimination were dose-independent, dose proportionality being confirmed. Bioavailability of the oral P was approximately 10% compared with intramuscular P.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, 2026·Fertility and sterility
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is a clinical diagnosis associated with abnormal luteal phase length of ≤10 days. Potential etiologies of LPD include inadequate progesterone duration, inadequate progesterone levels, or endometrial progesterone resistance. Luteal phase deficiency has been described in association with medical conditions, but also in fertile, normally menstruating women. Although progesterone is important for the process of implantation and early embryonic development, LPD has not been proven to be an independent entity causing infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Controversy exists regarding the multiple proposed measures for diagnosing LPD, and assuming it can be diagnosed accurately, whether treatment improves outcomes. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2021 (Fertil Steril 2021;115(6):1416-23).