To compare the efficacy of Crinone 8% intravaginal progesterone gel vs. IM progesterone for luteal phase and early pregnancy support after IVF-ET.
Design
Randomized, open-label study.
Setting
Academic medical center.
PATIENT(S): Two hundred and one women undergoing IVF-ET.
INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomized to supplementation with Crinone 8% (90 mg once daily) or IM progesterone (50 mg once daily) beginning the day after oocyte retrieval.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy, embryo implantation, and live birth rates.
RESULT(S): The women randomized to luteal phase supplementation with IM progesterone had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (48.5% vs. 30.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 3.87), embryo implantation (24.1% vs. 17.5%; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08, 3.30), and live birth rates (39.4% vs. 24.5%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.70) than women randomized to Crinone 8%.
CONCLUSION(S): In women undergoing IVF-ET, once-a-day progesterone supplementation with Crinone 8%, beginning the day after oocyte retrieval, resulted in significantly lower embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates compared with women supplemented with IM progesterone.
Crinone 8% vs intramuscular progesterone IVF luteal support, vaginal progesterone gel vs IM progesterone embryo transfer outcomes, luteal phase supplementation route of administration IVF pregnancy rates, randomized study progesterone supplementation IVF-ET live birth rates, Crinone vaginal gel lower pregnancy rates than IM progesterone, progesterone supplementation method comparison embryo implantation rates, IVF luteal support intramuscular vs intravaginal progesterone randomized, early pregnancy support progesterone after oocyte retrieval, Yanushpolsky progesterone supplementation IVF randomized study, progesterone formulation effect on IVF clinical pregnancy rates
PMID 11730742 11730742 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2
Cite this article
Propst, A. M., Hill, J. A., Ginsburg, E. S., Hurwitz, S., Politch, J., & Yanushpolsky, E. H. (2001). A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. *Fertility and sterility*, *76*(6), 1144-1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2
Propst AM, Hill JA, Ginsburg ES, Hurwitz S, Politch J, Yanushpolsky EH. A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(6):1144-1149. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2
Propst, A. M., et al. "A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 76, no. 6, 2001, pp. 1144-1149.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral micronized progesterone compared with IM progesterone in oil for luteal support in patients undergoing IVF who are treated with a GnRH agonist.
DESIGN: Ran...
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of food ingestion and administered dose on the absorption of oral micronized P (Utrogestan; Besins-Iscovesco, Paris, France) and to compare the bioavailability of in...
A progesterone solution was administered by intravaginal instillation, intramuscular injection, and sublingually to estrogen-deficient women, with or without estradiol (E2) replacement, and serum prog...
Objective: To examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.
Design: Retrospect...
Infertility > Assisted Reproductive Technology > IVF OutcomesPregnancy > Neonatal Outcomes > Birth Weight and Gestational AgeContraception/Comparison > ART vs Natural Conception > Sibling Studies