To determine the ability of luteal phase length determined by basal body temperature (BBT) pattern and a midluteal serum progesterone level to predict the result of an endometrial biopsy in a subsequent cycle.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 141 women with a history of infertility who were being evaluated for luteal function. The luteal phase length determined from a BBT chart of one menstrual cycle was compared to a single midluteal serum progesterone level from a second menstrual cycle. These findings were compared to a luteal phase endometrial biopsy performed in a third menstrual cycle. Subjects were divided into four groups depending upon luteal phase length (normal 11 or more days) and serum progesterone level (normal at least 10 ng/mL). The four groups were designated "normal," "short luteal phase," "low progesterone," and "abnormal," depending upon the results of the two tests. The frequency of in- and out-of-phase endometrial biopsy results in the four groups was compared.
Results
There was no difference in the occurrence of an in- or out-of-phase endometrial biopsy when the four groups were compared.
Conclusion
Neither luteal phase length nor a single midluteal serum progesterone level was predictive of subsequent in-phase or out-of-phase endometrial biopsy.
luteal phase length basal body temperature endometrial biopsy prediction, midluteal serum progesterone level endometrial dating accuracy, luteal phase defect diagnosis BBT chart progesterone biopsy, endometrial biopsy in-phase out-of-phase luteal function evaluation, basal body temperature progesterone predictive value infertility workup, luteal phase length 11 days threshold progesterone 10 ng/mL, retrospective analysis luteal function infertile women, serum progesterone single measurement luteal adequacy, endometrial biopsy timing luteal phase defect diagnosis limitations, infertility evaluation luteal phase progesterone endometrial histology correlation
Cite this article
Nakajima, S. T., Molloy, M. H., Oi, R. H., Ohlson, K. A., Azevedo, R. A., & Boyers, S. P. (1994). Clinical evaluation of luteal function. *Obstetrics and gynecology*, *84*(2), 219-221.
Nakajima ST, Molloy MH, Oi RH, Ohlson KA, Azevedo RA, Boyers SP. Clinical evaluation of luteal function. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(2):219-221.
Nakajima, S. T., et al. "Clinical evaluation of luteal function." *Obstetrics and gynecology*, vol. 84, no. 2, 1994, pp. 219-221.
Keywords
Adult, Biopsy, Body Temperature, Corpus Luteum/physiopathology, Endometrium/pathology, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female/blood/pathology/physiopathology, Luteal Phase/physiology, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Progesterone/blood, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Progesterone
Alexander SE et al., 1992American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Blood samples were obtained during early follicular, periovulatory, and luteal phases in four women with out-of-phase endometrial biopsy specimens and four normal controls. In the study cycle, follicu...
In order to clarify the relationship between endometrial histology and progesterone (P4), plasma P4 and estradiol levels in the luteal phase were measured in 126 cases of unexplained infertility. Endo...
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the extent and sources of imprecision in histologic dating of the endometrial biopsy.
DESIGN: Duplicate endometrial biopsies from 25 women were dated by five evaluators on ...
Fifteen infertile women with inadequate luteal phase, histologically documented in at least two separate cycles, and normal midluteal plasma levels of progesterone (greater than or equal to 10 ng/mL),...