To assess the risk of venous thrombosis in current users of non-oral hormonal contraception.
Design
Historical national registry based cohort study.
Setting
Four national registries in Denmark.
Participants
All Danish non-pregnant women aged 15-49 (n=1,626,158), free of previous thrombotic disease or cancer, were followed from 2001 to 2010.
Main Outcome Measures
Incidence rate of venous thrombosis in users of transdermal, vaginal, intrauterine, or subcutaneous hormonal contraception, relative risk of venous thrombosis compared with non-users, and rate ratios of venous thrombosis in current users of non-oral products compared with the standard reference oral contraceptive with levonorgestrel and 30-40 µg oestrogen. Diagnoses were confirmed by at least four weeks of anticoagulation therapy after the diagnosis.
Results
Within 9,429,128 woman years of observation, 5287 first ever venous thrombosis events were recorded, of which 3434 were confirmed. In non-users of hormonal contraception the incidence rate of confirmed events was 2.1 per 10,000 woman years. Compared with non-users of hormonal contraception, and after adjustment for age, calendar year, and education, the relative risk of confirmed venous thrombosis in users of transdermal combined contraceptive patches was 7.9 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 17.7) and of the vaginal ring was 6.5 (4.7 to 8.9). The corresponding incidences per 10,000 exposure years were 9.7 and 7.8 events. The relative risk was increased in women who used subcutaneous implants (1.4, 0.6 to 3.4) but not in those who used the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (0.6, 0.4 to 0.8). Compared with users of combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, the adjusted relative risk of venous thrombosis in users of transdermal patches was 2.3 (1.0 to 5.2) and of the vaginal ring was 1.9 (1.3 to 2.7).
Conclusion
Women who use transdermal patches or vaginal rings for contraception have a 7.9 and 6.5 times increased risk of confirmed venous thrombosis compared with non-users of hormonal contraception of the same age, corresponding to 9.7 and 7.8 events per 10,000 exposure years. The risk was slightly increased in women using subcutaneous implants but not in those using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system.
PMID 22577198 22577198 DOI 10.1136/bmj.e2990 10.1136/bmj.e2990
Cite this article
Lidegaard, O., Nielsen, L. H., Skovlund, C. W., & Løkkegaard, E. (2012). Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10. *BMJ (Clinical research ed.)*, *344*(may10 3), e2990. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2990
Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, Løkkegaard E. Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10. BMJ. 2012;344(may10 3):e2990. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2990
Lidegaard, O., et al. "Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10." *BMJ (Clinical research ed.)*, vol. 344, no. may10 3, 2012, pp. e2990.
Vinogradova Y et al., 2015
Open Access
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
Objective: To investigate the association between use of combined oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolism, taking the type of progestogen into account.
Design: Two nested case-control s...
Lidegaard Ø et al., 2011
Open Access
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
Objective: To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism from use of combined oral contraceptives according to progestogen type and oestrogen dose.
Design: National historical registry based cohort stu...
Jick SS et al., 2011
Open Access
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
Objective: To compare the risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism in women receiving oral contraceptives containing drospirenone with that in women receiving oral contraceptives containing levonorges...
Parkin L et al., 2011
Open Access
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
Objective: To examine the risk of non-fatal idiopathic venous thromboembolism in current users of a combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone, relative to current users of preparations conta...