Use of combined oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolism: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 350(may26 13), h2135

DOI 10.1136/bmj.h2135 PMID 26013557 Source

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between use of combined oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolism, taking the type of progestogen into account.

Design

Two nested case-control studies.

Setting

General practices in the United Kingdom contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD; 618 practices) and QResearch primary care database (722 practices).

Participants

Women aged 15-49 years with a first diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in 2001-13, each matched with up to five controls by age, practice, and calendar year.

Main outcome measures

Odds ratios for incident venous thromboembolism and use of combined oral contraceptives in the previous year, adjusted for smoking status, alcohol consumption, ethnic group, body mass index, comorbidities, and other contraceptive drugs. Results were combined across the two datasets.

Results

5062 cases of venous thromboembolism from CPRD and 5500 from QResearch were analysed. Current exposure to any combined oral contraceptive was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio 2.97, 95% confidence interval 2.78 to 3.17) compared with no exposure in the previous year. Corresponding risks associated with current exposure to desogestrel (4.28, 3.66 to 5.01), gestodene (3.64, 3.00 to 4.43), drospirenone (4.12, 3.43 to 4.96), and cyproterone (4.27, 3.57 to 5.11) were significantly higher than those for second generation contraceptives levonorgestrel (2.38, 2.18 to 2.59) and norethisterone (2.56, 2.15 to 3.06), and for norgestimate (2.53, 2.17 to 2.96). The number of extra cases of venous thromboembolism per year per 10,000 treated women was lowest for levonorgestrel (6, 95% confidence interval 5 to 7) and norgestimate (6, 5 to 8), and highest for desogestrel (14, 11 to 17) and cyproterone (14, 11 to 17).

Conclusions

In these population based, case-control studies using two large primary care databases, risks of venous thromboembolism associated with combined oral contraceptives were, with the exception of norgestimate, higher for newer drug preparations than for second generation drugs.

Topics

combined oral contraceptive venous thromboembolism, vte risk hormonal contraception, desogestrel blood clot risk, gestodene thrombosis risk, drospirenone venous thromboembolism, birth control pill blood clot, progestogen type vte risk, levonorgestrel thrombosis comparison, oral contraceptive safety thromboembolism, hormonal contraception side effects clotting, second generation third generation pill vte

Cite this article

Vinogradova, Y., Coupland, C., & Hippisley-Cox, J. (2015). Use of combined oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolism: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases. *BMJ (Clinical research ed.)*, *350*(may26 13), h2135. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2135

Related articles