Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (+/- standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 +/- 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of "in" or "out" of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.
interobserver variation endometrial biopsy dating luteal phase defect, endometrial histology dating pathologist agreement variability, luteal phase defect diagnosis endometrial biopsy reliability, Scott Snyder interobserver variation endometrial dating, endometrial biopsy in phase out of phase clinical management, luteal phase defect endometrial dating discrepancy pathologist, mid luteal late luteal biopsy histologic dating accuracy, endometrial biopsy reproducibility clinical decision making infertility, Noyes criteria interobserver variability endometrial dating, histologic endometrial dating diagnostic accuracy luteal phase
PMID 3203751 3203751 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9
Cite this article
Scott, R. T., Snyder, R. R., Strickland, Sr., D. M., Tyburski, C. C., Bagnall, J. A., Reed, K. R., Adair, C. A., & Hensley, S. B. (1988). The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. *Fertility and sterility*, *50*(6), 888-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9
Scott RT, Snyder RR, Strickland, Sr. DM, Tyburski CC, Bagnall JA, Reed KR, et al. The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertil Steril. 1988;50(6):888-892. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9
Scott, Richard T., et al. "The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 50, no. 6, 1988, pp. 888-892.
Objective: To examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.
Design: Retrospect...
Infertility > Assisted Reproductive Technology > IVF OutcomesPregnancy > Neonatal Outcomes > Birth Weight and Gestational AgeContraception/Comparison > ART vs Natural Conception > Sibling Studies
Objective: Disordered eating behaviors may impact the gynecologic health of adolescents through effects on menstrual cycle function and body size; however, few studies have evaluated these association...