The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

Fertility and sterility, 50(6), 888-892

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9 PMID 3203751 Source

Abstract

Endometrial biopsy specimens (n = 62) were evaluated by five pathologists to assess the effect of interobserver variation on histologic dating of the endometrium. The potential effect of this variation on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and resulting clinical management was also determined. Mean (+/- standard error) interobserver variation was 0.96 +/- 0.08 days, comparable to results reported by other investigators. The magnitude of the variation was not affected by whether the biopsy specimen was obtained in the mid or late luteal phase, the degree of lag between the dating and subsequent menses, or the presence of an LPD. Redating of a specimen by another pathologist would have resulted in a change in the determination of "in" or "out" of phase in 22% of cases. The subsequent probability of changing patient management altered ranged from 22% to 39% depending on the clinical setting.

Topics

endometrial biopsy dating variability, luteal phase defect diagnosis accuracy, interobserver variation endometrial histology, endometrial dating pathologist disagreement, luteal phase deficiency diagnostic criteria, endometrial biopsy interpretation reliability, histologic dating menstrual cycle, LPD diagnosis standardization, progesterone deficiency endometrial assessment, luteal phase support when to treat, endometrial biopsy timing luteal phase, pathology dating endometrium reproducibility

Cite this article

Scott, R. T., Snyder, R. R., Strickland, Sr., D. M., Tyburski, C. C., Bagnall, J. A., Reed, K. R., Adair, C. A., & Hensley, S. B. (1988). The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. *Fertility and sterility*, *50*(6), 888-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60367-9

Related articles