The association between the use of fertility indicators and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort
Elizabeth E Hatch, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Emma Skovgaard Pedersen, Kenneth J Rothman, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Joseph B Stanford, Lauren A Wise
Open Access
Department of Epidemiology Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USAROR
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus University Aarhus N DenmarkROR
Authors' Affiliations: 1Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts and 2Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District...ROR
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 38(8), 641-650
The use of fertility indicators to predict ovulation has largely been studied for contraceptive purposes, while less so as fertility-promoting tools.
Objective
To investigate the association between fertility indicators and fecundability in Danish women trying to conceive.
Methods
Web-based preconception cohort study. We analysed data from 11,328 females aged 18-49 years trying to conceive without fertility treatment for ≤6 menstrual cycles, from the Danish SnartGravid.dk and SnartForældre.dk cohorts (2007-2023). Participants reported the use of fertility indicators (counting days since the last menstrual period, cervical fluid monitoring, urinary ovulation testing, feeling ovulation, using a smartphone fertility app and measuring basal body temperature [BBT]). Time to pregnancy was measured in menstrual cycles ascertained by self-reported pregnancy status. We estimated fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using proportional probabilities regression models adjusted for age, socio-economic position, health indicators, reproductive history and gynaecological factors.
Results
Fertility indicators were used by 63.3% of participants at study entry. Counting days was the most common (46.9%), while measuring BBT was the least (3.0%). Other indicators ranged from 17.0% to 23.6%, with 69.7% using more than one indicator. Compared with non-use, use of any fertility indicator was associated with greater fecundability (adjusted FR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08, 1.19). Cervical fluid monitoring showed the strongest association (aFR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03, 2.07), followed by urinary ovulation testing (aFR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16, 1.58) and counting days (aFR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09, 1.29). Feeling ovulation and fertility apps were modestly associated with fecundability, while measuring BBT was not associated. Sensitivity analysis restricting to ≤2 cycles of attempt time and two cycles of follow-up showed an aFR for any indicator use of 1.21 (95% CI 1.13, 1.31).
Conclusion
In this Danish preconception cohort, use of fertility indicators was associated with a higher fecundability, varying by type of indicator.
PMID 39109606 39109606 DOI 10.1111/ppe.13108 10.1111/ppe.13108
Cite this article
Pedersen, E. S., Mikkelsen, E. M., Sørensen, H. T., Hatch, E. E., Wise, L. A., Rothman, K. J., Stanford, J. B., & Laursen, A. S. D. (2024). The association between the use of fertility indicators and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort. *Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology*, *38*(8), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13108
Pedersen ES, Mikkelsen EM, Sørensen HT, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Rothman KJ, et al. The association between the use of fertility indicators and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024;38(8):641-650. doi:10.1111/ppe.13108
Pedersen, E. S., et al. "The association between the use of fertility indicators and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort." *Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology*, vol. 38, no. 8, 2024, pp. 641-650.
Schliep KC et al., 2022Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Background: Women with endometriosis may have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research has focused on infertility clinic populations limiting generalisability. Few studies report diff...
DeVilbiss EA et al., 2020Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Background: Attaining pregnancy is conditional upon a series of complex processes, including adequately timed intercourse, ovulation, fertilisation, and implantation. Anovulation is a first-line treat...
Najmabadi S et al., 2020Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
BACKGROUND: There is variability between women for days of menstrual bleeding, cycle lengths, follicular phase lengths, and luteal phase lengths, related to age and parity.
OBJECTIVE: To describe tot...
Chang CP et al., 2020Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that women instructed in fertility awareness methods can identify the Peak Day of cervical mucus discharge for each menstrual cycle, and the Peak Day has...