Suppression of threatened premature labor by administration of cortisol and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate: a comparison with ritodrine

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 138(4), 404-408

DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90137-4 PMID 7424996 Source

Abstract

A shift in progesterone-to-estradiol balance to estradiol dominance is assumed to be a prerequisite for regular uterine contractions. To antagonize this effect in premature labor 24 consecutive women were treated with intravenous cortisol for 3 days and with weekly intramuscular injections of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17 OHP-C). Twenty-four similar patients treated with ritodrine served as a reference group. The delivery was postponed by at least 1 week in 21 patients (87.5%) in the steroid treatment group and in 18 patients (75%) in the ritodrine group. The premature labor lasted for 5.1 +/- 0.4 hours (mean +/- SEM) with steroid therapy and for 2.2 +/- 0.3 hours with ritodrine. In singleton pregnancies the gestational length and birth weight of the newborn infants were greater in the steroid treatment group (N = 23, 39.1 +/- 0.3 weeks, 3,460 +/- 119 gm) than in the ritodrine group (N = 24, 37.7 +/- 0.4 weeks, 3,106 +/- 118 gm). Steroid treatment suppressed serum estradiol concentrations (maximally by 60%) and, to a lesser extent, testosterone, estriol, and progresterone levels (maximally by 30%).

Topics

progesterone support preterm labor, 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate tocolysis, cortisol threatened premature labor, progesterone estradiol balance pregnancy, hormonal treatment preterm contractions, ritodrine versus progesterone preterm birth, steroid therapy threatened labor, gestational length progesterone supplementation, birth weight hormonal tocolysis, 17-OHP-C premature labor

Cite this article

Kauppila, A., Hartikainen-Sorri, A. L., Jänne, O., Tuimala, R., & Järvinen, P. A. (1980). Suppression of threatened premature labor by administration of cortisol and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate: a comparison with ritodrine. *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, *138*(4), 404-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90137-4

Related articles