"Response to ""The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates informed consent for infertility treatment"""

  • Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University of Heidelberg, Vossstrasse 9, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. petra.frank-herrmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de ROR
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf ROR

Fertility and sterility, 125(1), 179

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.021 PMID 41475700

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

Frank-Herrmann response RRM informed consent infertility treatment, restorative reproductive medicine informed consent violation rebuttal, RRM infertility treatment ethical informed consent defense, Frank-Herrmann Gnoth Freundl RRM fertility sterility, reproductive medicine informed consent debate letter, restorative reproductive medicine infertility ethics response, RRM vs conventional infertility treatment informed consent, fertility sterility RRM patient autonomy letter, informed consent infertility RRM clinical practice, restorative reproductive medicine professional debate ethics
PMID 41475700 41475700 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.021 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.021

Cite this article

Frank-Herrmann, P., Freundl-Schütt, T., & Gnoth, C. (2026). Response to “The illusion of reproductive choice: how restorative reproductive medicine violates reproductive autonomy and informed consent”. *Fertility and sterility*, *125*(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.021

Related articles