Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology

  • University of British Columbia ROR

Fertility and Sterility, 105(4), 887-890

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040 PMID 26773194

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

Gomel reconstructive tubal microsurgery versus IVF, tubal microsurgery compared to assisted reproductive technology, fallopian tube reconstruction surgical technique outcomes, tubal reanastomosis microsurgery fertility outcomes, surgical alternatives to IVF tubal factor infertility, Gomel tubal surgery ART comparison fertility sterility, tubal ligation reversal microsurgical technique, reconstructive reproductive surgery versus in vitro fertilization, fallopian tube repair microsurgery fertility restoration, tubal factor infertility surgical versus ART treatment
PMID 26773194 26773194 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Cite this article

Gomel, V. (2016). Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology. *Fertility and sterility*, *105*(4), 887-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Related articles