Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine, 2026
Abstract
This secondary analysis examined two independent U.S. surveys (J.L. Partners, N=1002; McLaughlin & Associates, N=1000) investigating public perspectives on fertility treatments. Initial support for IVF reached approximately 80%, though respondents demonstrated limited procedural knowledge. Conversely, only 33% initially supported restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), with 43% unfamiliar with it. After receiving detailed information, preferences shifted substantially: 69% favored natural fertilization approaches versus 17% preferring laboratory fertilization. Respondents prioritized "baby health (74%) over cost (13%) and time to conceive (6%)." Support for IVF declined by 10% following presentation of medical risks and ethical considerations. Findings suggest the public values comprehensive assessment, diagnostic approaches addressing underlying causes, treatment transparency, and ethical sensitivity in fertility care.
Cite this article
Parnell, T. A., Copeland, K., & Minjeur, M. (2026). Public Awareness, Perceptions, and Preferences in Fertility Treatment: Secondary Analysis of Two Public Surveys. *Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine*. https://doi.org/10.63264/6yy3mw82
Parnell TA, Copeland K, Minjeur M. Public Awareness, Perceptions, and Preferences in Fertility Treatment: Secondary Analysis of Two Public Surveys. Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine. 2026. doi:10.63264/6yy3mw82