Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.ROR
To test for the possible association of past oral contraceptive (OC) use and incident fracture after menopause.
Design
A prospective cohort of 93,725 postmenopausal women.
Setting
Forty Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical centers across the United States. PATIENT(S): Ethnically diverse 93,725 volunteer postmenopausal women, 50 to 79 years old. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The main outcome was self-reported incident first fracture assessed prospectively by annual questionnaire. RESULT(S): The adjusted relative hazard (HR) for fracture among past OC users was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01-1.15). Among women without any postmenopausal hormone treatment, past OC use for < or =5 years led to an HR of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.27) and for past OC use >5 years led to an HR of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.97-1.23) compared with never users. CONCLUSION(S): This study does not support the idea that past OC use protects against later fracture.
oral contraceptive use postmenopausal fracture risk, prior oral contraceptive bone health fracture WHI, Women's Health Initiative oral contraceptive fracture observational cohort, oral contraceptive bone mineral density long-term effects, past OC use osteoporotic fracture postmenopause, Barad Watts oral contraceptive fracture WHI study, hormonal contraception skeletal health postmenopausal women, oral contraceptive bone protection myth fracture risk, duration oral contraceptive use fracture hazard ratio, postmenopausal hormone treatment oral contraceptive history fracture
PMID 16084878 16084878 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.132 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.132
Cite this article
Barad, D., Kooperberg, C., Wactawski-Wende, J., Liu, J., Hendrix, S. L., & Watts, N. B. (2005). Prior oral contraception and postmenopausal fracture: a Women's Health Initiative observational cohort study. Fertility and sterility, 84(2), 374-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.132
Barad D, Kooperberg C, Wactawski-Wende J, Liu J, Hendrix SL, Watts NB. Prior oral contraception and postmenopausal fracture: a Women's Health Initiative observational cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(2):374-383. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.132
Barad, D., et al. "Prior oral contraception and postmenopausal fracture: a Women's Health Initiative observational cohort study." Fertility and sterility, vol. 84, no. 2, 2005, pp. 374-383.
Keywords
Contraceptives, Oral
Related articles
Bone HealthQuality of Life ImpactProspective Cohort StudiesFracture Outcomes
Although the short-term impact of incident fragility fractures on health-related quality of life (HRQL) of older people has been confirmed, we lack long-term evidence. We explored the impact of incident fragility fractures on HRQL, among people aged 50 years and older, using 10-year prospective data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). This study was based on data from 7753 (2187 men and 5566 women) participants of CaMos. The HRQL, measured through the Health Utility Index (HUI), was captured at baseline and year 10. The incident fragility fractures were recorded over 10 years of follow-up at spine, hip, rib, shoulder, pelvis, or forearm. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to measure the mean difference, termed as deficit, in the HUI scores for participants with and without fractures. We examined the effects of single or multiple fragility fractures, time (fractures that occurred between year 1 to 5 and 6 to 10) and recovery to the prefracture level. Incident spine and hip fractures were associated with significant deficits (varied from -0.19 to -0.07) on the HUI scores. Hip and spine fractures were associated with negative impact on mobility, self-care, and ambulation. Fractures that occurred closer to the follow-up assessment were associated with significant impact on HRQL compared to fractures occurring a long time before it, except for hip fracture (deficits lasted 5 years or longer). Similarly, multiple hip (-0.14), spine (-0.16), and rib (-0.21) fractures significantly impacted the HRQL of women. Women with a hip fracture never recovered to their prefracture level score (OR = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.98). Our analysis suggests that single and multiple hip fractures as well as multiple spine and rib fractures strongly impact the HRQL of older people over a prolonged period of time.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, 2026·Fertility and sterility
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is a clinical diagnosis associated with abnormal luteal phase length of ≤10 days. Potential etiologies of LPD include inadequate progesterone duration, inadequate progesterone levels, or endometrial progesterone resistance. Luteal phase deficiency has been described in association with medical conditions, but also in fertile, normally menstruating women. Although progesterone is important for the process of implantation and early embryonic development, LPD has not been proven to be an independent entity causing infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Controversy exists regarding the multiple proposed measures for diagnosing LPD, and assuming it can be diagnosed accurately, whether treatment improves outcomes. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2021 (Fertil Steril 2021;115(6):1416-23).
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2026·Fertility and Sterility
Current strategies for the assessment and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss are discussed. This replaces the previous document, titled, "Evaluation and treatment a committee opinion," last published in 2012.
This narrative review examines the evidence for medical optimization of inflammatory conditions, vitamin deficiencies, endocrine disorders, immune dysregulation, oligo-ovulation, and luteal phase factors to improve fertility outcomes in women attempting to conceive through natural or timed intercourse. Overall, there is a paucity of data with respect to these categories among patients pursuing timed intercourse, precluding our ability to draw strong recommendations. However, there is strong evidence supporting treatment of endocrine disorders, specifically overt thyroid dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia, as well as oligo-ovulation. Conversely, treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism is not recommended. The current data are insufficient to support empiric use of antiinflammatory medications, corticosteroids, thyroid hormones, or vitamins or supplements to improve chances of pregnancy in a general infertility population.