Prevention of preterm birth. Role of daily telephone contact

The Journal of reproductive medicine, 41(8), 595-601

PMID 8866388 Source

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of routine management of patients at high risk for preterm delivery to the effectiveness of routine management in combination with daily telephone nursing contact.

Study design

The control group, 1 (n = 21), had education and frequent prenatal visits and cervical examinations. The study group, 2 (n = 21), had education, frequent prenatal visits and cervical examination, and daily telephone contact. Group 3 (n = 22) received education but refused to participate.

Results

There were no significant differences (SD) between groups in race, smoking, age, multiple gestation, visits, diagnosis of premature labor, mean days gained after diagnosis of premature labor, tocolytic use or bed rest. There was also no SD in preterm birth rate, mode of delivery, number of maternal or neonatal hospital days, mean neonatal weight or gestational age at delivery between groups. While not reducing the overall incidence of preterm birth, this management for all groups resulted in a more advanced gestational age at the time of delivery (mean change = 7.5 weeks, P < .0001) when compared to the patient's first preterm birth.

Conclusion

This study indicated that daily contact, while providing reassurance and support, did not change the outcome when the study group was compared to women managed similarly but without daily contact.

Topics

preterm birth prevention telephone contact, premature labor high risk management, daily nursing contact preterm delivery, cervical examination preterm birth, telephone monitoring pregnancy outcomes, tocolytic therapy preterm labor, frequent prenatal visits preterm birth, preterm delivery gestational age, bed rest preterm labor, randomized trial preterm birth prevention

Cite this article

Boehm, F. H., Glass, C. A., & Reed, G. W. (1996). Prevention of preterm birth. Role of daily telephone contact. *The Journal of reproductive medicine*, *41*(8), 595-601.

Related articles