This prospective study was designed to investigate the effect of glucocorticoids, promethazine (Phenergan), hyskon, heparin, and Ringer's lactated solution in the prevention of pelvic adhesion formation after pelvic surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: The first consisted of 396 patients who had laparotomy for different types of pelvic surgery, and the second group consisted of 546 patients who had operative laparoscopy for different types of pelvic disease. Patients in these two major groups were divided prospectively into different subgroups with different modalities of adjuvant therapy to prevent postoperative pelvic adhesions. A second-look laparoscopy was performed for some of the patients who failed to conceive in each of these subgroups. Pregnancy rate and adhesion formation were compared between these subgroups with no statistical difference noted. It is concluded that glucocorticoids, promethazine, heparin, and hyskon have no therapeutic advantage over Ringer's lactated solution in the prevention of postoperative pelvic adhesion formation.
PMID 2446499 2446499 DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80291-0 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80291-0
Cite this article
Fayez, J. A., & Schneider, P. J. (1987). Prevention of pelvic adhesion formation by different modalities of treatment. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 157(5), 1184-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80291-0
Fayez JA, Schneider PJ. Prevention of pelvic adhesion formation by different modalities of treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(5):1184-1188. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80291-0
Fayez, J. A., and P. J. Schneider. "Prevention of pelvic adhesion formation by different modalities of treatment." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 157, no. 5, 1987, pp. 1184-1188.
Adhesion re-formation after a reproductive operation, particularly involving the pelvic sidewall, is a prominent cause of failure in the surgical treatment of infertility. This study was done to evaluate the impact of standard microsurgery through laparotomy and the additional benefit of an oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier (INTERCEED [TC7] Absorbable Adhesion Barrier [Ethicon Inc.]), in reducing pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. One hundred and thirty-four patients with bilateral pelvic sidewall adhesions undergoing adhesiolysis by standard microsurgical techniques through laparotomy were treated during a prospective randomized trial involving 13 centers. After adhesiolysis, the deperitonealized surface of one pelvic sidewall was randomly assigned to be covered with INTERCEED Barrier, the contralateral sidewall serving as control. A second-look laparoscopy was performed ten days to 14 weeks postoperatively. Microsurgical adhesiolysis alone resulted in 24 percent of the sidewalls becoming free of adhesions and a 55.6 percent reduction in the area of adherent peritoneum. With microsurgery alone, 60 and 39 percent of adhesions initially characterized as filmy or severe, respectively, were not seen at second-look laparoscopy. The use of INTERCEED Barrier increased the incidence of adhesion-free sidewalls twofold. The treatment was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in the area of peritoneum affected by adhesion re-formation, compared with the control wall. Of the adhesions originally graded as severe, 61 percent of those treated with INTERCEED Barrier did not re-form at all. When evaluated on filmy adhesions, the use of the barrier was associated with a 72 percent reduction in adhesion re-formation. A measurable reduction in adhesion re-formation was found, depending on the initial adhesion type, with microsurgery alone. The addition of INTERCEED Barrier further reduced the incidence, extent and severity of postoperative adhesion re-formation. In this study, 90 percent of the patients benefited from the use of INTERCEED Barrier.
Eight patients with extensive adhesions and 10 undergoing myomectomy had Gore-Tex surgical membranes placed to prevent adhesion formation/reformation. At the time of second-look laparoscopy, the membranes were removed easily, and the extent of adhesion was minimal. Further studies are ongoing to validate these findings and to compare the Gore-Tex surgical membrane with antiadhesion agents.
EndometriosisAMH and Ovarian ReserveSurgical Staging and TypologyAnti-Müllerian Hormone
Endometriosis is a chronic, gynecologic condition in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus implants throughout the body. Women with endometriosis have a higher prevalence of infertility and a greater risk of early natural menopause compared to those without endometriosis. This study aimed to evaluate preoperative serum AMH levels among women with and without incident endometriosis and to assess whether levels differ by surgical staging and typology. The ENDO (Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes) study was conducted between 2007 and 2009. The ENDO study consisted of an operative and population cohort (n=600). Only those in the ENDO operative cohort from the Utah site were used for this analysis, and included women aged 18 to 44 years who were scheduled for gynecologic surgery, irrespective of clinical indication (n=476). AMH levels were measured from stored serum collected before surgery using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After excluding participants with missing outcome data (n=51), unilateral oophorectomy (n=8), or those within the population cohort (n=69), 348 participants remained for the analysis. Surgically confirmed endometriosis diagnosis, staging (American Society for Reproductive Medicine I-IV), and typology (superficial, deep, ovarian) were ascertained by the operative report. Outliers for AMH (>14.0 ng/mL) were excluded from the analyses and AMH values were log-transformed. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age (squared and continuous), body mass index, serum cotinine levels, and exogenous hormonal contraceptive use were conducted. Percentage differences in AMH were calculated as (exp[β]-1)×100, and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Compared with no endometriosis, incident endometriosis diagnosis was associated with lower AMH levels (-19.8%; 95% confidence interval, -37.0 to 1.0); however, this association was not statistically significant. Stage III to IV disease was associated with 40.1% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -58.9 to -12.7). Ovarian endometriomas were most strongly associated with lower AMH levels (-54.3%; 95% confidence interval, -69.4 to -31.8), with a more pronounced association among those with infertility (-72.6%; 95% confidence interval, -85.4 to -48.5). Deep (-24.1%; 95% confidence interval, -48.2 to 11.0) and superficial (-15.5%; 95% confidence interval, -34.6 to 9.3) endometriosis also showed a trend toward lower AMH levels, but these findings were not statistically significant. Compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis, incident endometriosis was associated with 26.8% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -44.6 to -3.4). Stage III to IV disease was associated with 47.8% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -65.8 to -23.2), and all subtypes of endometriosis were statistically significantly associated with lower levels of AMH compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis (ovarian: -60.8%; 95% confidence interval, -74.4 to -39.9; -34.3%; 95% confidence interval, -56.2 to -1.4; -24.8%; 95% confidence interval, -43.9 to -0.8). Ovarian and moderate to severe (stage III-IV) endometriosis were associated with markedly lower AMH levels compared with no endometriosis. Compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis, incident endometriosis and moderate to severe stages (stage III-IV) were associated with statistically significantly lower AMH levels. Additionally, typology (deep, ovarian, or superficial) was associated with statistically significantly lower AMH levels. However, this association was likely driven by the presence of ovarian endometriomas across all subtypes. These findings are consistent with previous studies and demonstrate that endometriosis lesions themselves, independent of surgical intervention, influence AMH levels.
General OB/GYNUterine Closure TechniqueHysterotomy RepairCesarean Scar Complications
Bujold E et al., 2026·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Normal uterine function depends on cyclical regeneration and the capacity to sustain pregnancy. A cesarean incision represents an injury to this remarkable organ. Although the uterus possesses exceptional healing potential, cesarean delivery increases the risk of secondary infertility, pelvic pain, uterine rupture, and abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies. The two most important determinants of successful hysterotomy healing after cesarean delivery are the location of the incision and the surgical technique used for closure. The anatomic site of entry-whether the corpus, lower uterine segment, or cervix-defines the tissue composition, vascularity, and contractility at the wound margins, which in turn influence how the scar remodels and withstands subsequent pregnancies. Surgical technique is also important. A robust body of experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates that restoring anatomic integrity by reapproximating uterine layers while excluding the endometrium produces stronger scars and reduces late complications. The rationale for excluding the endometrium is to prevent displacement of endometrial tissue into the myometrium and to avoid mucosal tearing against a foreign body (i.e. suture material), both of which predispose to defective healing. When the endometrium is incorporated, healing is often impaired, leading to niches or isthmoceles, adenomyosis, and endometriosis at the scar site. Over time, these defects have been recognized as contributors to abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, infertility, uterine rupture, and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Despite this evidence, single-layer closures that incorporate endometrium became widely adopted because of their speed and simplicity, while their long-term sequels were initially underappreciated. This has prompted renewed scrutiny of closure techniques, including comparisons of single-layer vs double-layer closure, locking vs nonlocking sutures, type of sutures, and the direction of suture. Collectively, the data show that optimal closure respects uterine anatomy, restores the natural alignment of tissues, and achieves hemostasis without compromising perfusion or strangulating tissues. Building on these principles, we herein describe a refined 3-layer closure. The first layer approximates decidua and junctional myometrium while excluding surface endometrium to prevent tissue entrapment and bacterial contamination. The second layer restores anatomic wall integrity by reapproximating the bulk of the myometrium, thereby reinforcing strength and distributing tension across the scar. The third layer reapproximates superficial myometrium and serosa, smoothing the uterine surface and reducing adhesions. This technique is not simply a return to traditional double-layer methods or an extension of single-layer practice, but rather a refinement that integrates lessons from visceral surgery and contemporary obstetric data. Its rationale is to restore anatomy, secure hemostasis without ischemia, and preserve long-term uterine function. While short-term safety appears comparable across closure methods, evidence increasingly indicates that long-term reproductive outcomes depend on how closure respects tissue biology. We argue that appropriate repair is more meticulous restoration of uterine anatomy should take precedence over operative speed. The enduring success of a hysterotomy repair depends on the surgical technique employed, as it directly affects women's future reproductive health.