Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System

Author affiliations (2)
  • University of Utah ROR
  • Covenant Health System ROR

Archives of Family Medicine, 8(5), 391-402, 1999

DOI 10.1001/archfami.8.5.391 PMID 10500511

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System (CrMS).

Design

Couples who began use of the CrMS were entered into this observational cohort study. Follow-up included detailed reviews of use of the CrMS. Pregnancy probabilities were calculated with both net and gross life-table analysis through 18 months.

Setting

A natural family planning service delivery program based at an urban hospital in Houston, Tex.

Subjects

A group of 701 couples who received instruction in the CrMS were entered into the study. Most couples (93%) were engaged or married. Most women were white (83%), between the ages of 20 and 34 years (88%), and college graduates (58%).

Main Outcome Measure

Pregnancies were classified based on a detailed evaluation involving the pregnant woman (usually with her partner).

Results

At 12 months, the following net pregnancy probabilities were found per 100 couples: method-related pregnancies, 0.14; pregnancies caused by user and/or teacher error, 2.72; pregnancies caused by achieving-related behavior (genital contact during a time known to be fertile), 12.84; unresolved pregnancies, 1.43; and total pregnancies, 17.12. Pregnancy probabilities were similar when stratified by the following reproductive categories: uncomplicated regular cycles, long cycles, discontinuing oral contraceptives, breastfeeding, and other.

Conclusions

Pregnancy probabilities of the CrMS compare favorably with those of other methods of family planning. Most pregnancies result from genital contact during a known fertile time. Women need not have regular cycles to use the CrMS successfully.

Topics

Creighton Model Fertility Care System pregnancy probabilities, CrMS effectiveness natural family planning cohort study, Howard Stanford Creighton Model pregnancy rates, natural family planning method effectiveness life table analysis, Creighton Model irregular cycles breastfeeding effectiveness, fertility awareness based method unintended pregnancy rates, Creighton Model user error achieving related behavior pregnancy, natural family planning discontinuing oral contraceptives effectiveness, CrMS method related pregnancy probability 12 months, Creighton Model FertilityCare cervical mucus method outcomes
PMID 10500511 10500511 DOI 10.1001/archfami.8.5.391 10.1001/archfami.8.5.391

Cite this article

Howard, M. P., & Stanford, J. B. (1999). Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System. *Archives of family medicine*, *8*(5), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.8.5.391

Related articles