Pregnancies, intentions, and fertility behaviors during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System after initial intention to avoid pregnancy: Results from the Creighton Model effectiveness, intentions, behaviors assessment study

  • University of Utah ROR
  • Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
  • Elliot Hospital ROR

PloS one, 20(7), e0328806

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0328806 PMID 40729325

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle can be applied to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. Fertility intentions and sexual behaviors during the fertile time may influence whether and when pregnancy occurs. The Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) is a specific system of fertility appreciation used to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. The objective of this paper is to report intentions, behaviors, and pregnancy rates during use of the CrMS among couples who initially intended to avoid pregnancy.Data and methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort study conducted in 17 CrMS centers across the USA and Canada, following 296 couples for up to one year after onset of initial use of the CrMS to avoid pregnancy. Baseline data included demographics, motivations, and pregnancy intentions for each partner. Couples contributed 2894 menstrual cycles, most of which had data collected (by questionnaires and daily diary) on cycle-specific pregnancy intentions, days of potential fertility, and fertility behaviors. Pregnancies were prospectively actively ascertained.

Results

We found a high concordance (91%) in cycle pregnancy intentions between partners. However, 44% of cycles with strong intentions to avoid pregnancy included intercourse on potentially fertile days or days of undetermined fertility status. Across all sensitivity scenarios, cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to conceive ranged from 88.0% to 89.8%, and cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to avoid ranged from 29.1% to 35.3%. In multivariate analysis, baseline motivations and intentions for pregnancy within 2 years were strongly correlated with the likelihood of pregnancy, more so than cycle intentions.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that in some populations using natural family planning, baseline motivations and intentions may be more strongly related to pregnancy rates than cycle intentions. Our findings also highlight essential elements for evaluating correct use, including complete recording of intercourse and its timing.

Topics

Creighton Model FertilityCare System pregnancy avoidance, fertility intentions behaviors natural family planning, Stanford Najmabadi Creighton Model effectiveness study, CEIBA study Creighton Model prospective cohort, pregnancy rate intention avoid Creighton Model, cervical mucus monitoring fertility awareness method, cycle-specific pregnancy intentions partner concordance, natural family planning effectiveness real-world data, fertile day intercourse unintended pregnancy NFP, baseline motivation pregnancy prediction CrMS
PMID 40729325 40729325 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0328806 10.1371/journal.pone.0328806

Cite this article

Stanford, J. B., Najmabadi, S., Chang, C. P. E., Agyemang, D. O., Rivet, K., & Porucznik, C. A. (2025). Pregnancies, intentions, and fertility behaviors during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System after initial intention to avoid pregnancy: Results from the Creighton Model effectiveness, intentions, behaviors assessment study. *PloS one*, *20*(7), e0328806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328806

Related articles