Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives

  • Copenhagen University Hospital ROR
  • University of Copenhagen ROR
  • Herlev Hospital ROR
  • Rigshospitalet ROR

The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care : the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception, 25(1), 65-71

DOI 10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158 PMID 31852271

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to assess whether the ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were lower among women using the progestin-only pill (POP) or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and similar to the decrease observed in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill users.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised 565 hormonal contraceptive users (COC, POP, LNG-IUS or contraceptive vaginal ring) and 983 non-hormonal contraceptive users, who were seen in two Danish fertility assessment and counselling clinics between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to examine the differences in AMH and AFC between hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive users.

Results

Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AMH was 31.1% lower among COC users [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6%, -25.9%; p < 0.001], 35.6% lower among POP users (95% CI -49.0%, -18.6%; p < 0.001) and 17.1% lower among LNG-IUS users (95% CI -31.4%, 0.002%; p = 0.052); no significant differences were seen among vaginal ring users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AFC was 31.3% lower among COC users (95% CI -35.0%, -25.3%; p < 0.001) and 29.7% lower among POP users (-39.1%, -17.9%; p < 0.001); no significant differences were seen among LNG-IUS or vaginal ring users. Ovarian volume was more than 50% reduced among COC and vaginal ring users (p < 0.001) but was unchanged among POP and LNG-IUS users.

Conclusion

Assessment of ovarian reserve markers among users of all types of hormonal contraception should be interpreted cautiously and the type of contraceptive method considered.

Topics

anti-Mullerian hormone AMH hormonal contraceptive suppression, antral follicle count AFC oral contraceptive pill users, progestin-only pill ovarian reserve markers AMH reduction, levonorgestrel intrauterine system LNG-IUS AMH levels, combined oral contraceptive ovarian volume reduction fertility assessment, hormonal contraception ovarian reserve interpretation caution, contraceptive vaginal ring AMH antral follicle count, fertility assessment counselling hormonal contraceptive users Denmark, ovarian reserve testing bias hormonal contraception retrospective study, Landersoe Nyboe Andersen ovarian reserve contraceptive effects
PMID 31852271 31852271 DOI 10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158 10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158

Cite this article

Landersoe, S. K., Forman, J. L., Birch Petersen, K., Larsen, E. C., Nøhr, B., Hvidman, H. W., Nielsen, H. S., & Nyboe Andersen, A. (2020). Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives. *The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception*, *25*(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158

Related articles