Nutrient supplementation: improving male fertility fourfold

  • Division of Urology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
  • Hackensack University Medical Center ROR
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School ROR

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 31(4), 293-300

DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1345277 PMID 23775385

Abstract

Oxidative stress can contribute to impairment in spermatogenesis leading to male-factor infertility. The effectiveness of various antioxidants (such as carnitine, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, carotenoids, glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, zinc, folic acid, and coenzyme Q10) is variable with respect to improving semen parameters and pregnancy rates. A recent Cochrane review determined that men taking antioxidants had a statistically significant increase in both live birth rates and pregnancy rates. For those undergoing assisted reproduction, the odds ratio that antioxidant use would improve pregnancy rates was 4.18, with a 4.85-fold improvement in live birth rate also noted. Further investigation with randomized, controlled clinical trials is needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of antioxidant supplementation in the medical management and treatment of male infertility.

Topics

antioxidant supplementation male infertility semen parameters, nutrient supplementation improving male fertility sperm quality, oxidative stress spermatogenesis antioxidant treatment review, carnitine vitamin C vitamin E selenium male fertility, coenzyme Q10 zinc folic acid sperm improvement, antioxidants assisted reproduction pregnancy rates live birth, Cochrane review antioxidants male infertility outcomes, N-acetylcysteine glutathione male reproductive health, oxidative stress sperm DNA damage antioxidant therapy, Mora-Esteves Shin nutrient supplementation male fertility
PMID 23775385 23775385 DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1345277 10.1055/s-0033-1345277

Cite this article

Mora-Esteves, C., & Shin, D. (2013). Nutrient supplementation: improving male fertility fourfold. *Seminars in reproductive medicine*, *31*(4), 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1345277

Related articles