Mild endometriosis and ovulatory dysfunction: effect of danazol treatment on success of ovulation induction

Fertility and sterility, 46(5), 784-789

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49811-0 PMID 3096780 Source

Abstract

The effectiveness of ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate or human menopausal gonadotropins was evaluated in 52 infertile women with stage I or stage II endometriosis and ovulatory dysfunction: anovulation or luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) syndrome before (group I) and after (group II) danazol treatment. The incidence of anovulation and LUF in the endometriosis population was 9% and 34%, respectively. In group I, 10 of 36 patients (27.8%) conceived, with an average of 17.6 induction cycles per pregnancy. In group II, 21 of 30 patients (70%) conceived, with an average of 4.5 cycles per pregnancy (difference significant at P less than 0.001). There was no difference in the average number of ovulation induction cycles per patient between groups I and II (4.9 and 3.1, respectively). Of 14 patients who did not conceive in group I and crossed over to group II, 9 (64.3%) conceived (not different from group II). Spontaneous abortion rates were 20% in group I and 14% in group II. These results indicate that mild endometriosis may interfere with conception through mechanisms other than ovulatory dysfunction and that treatment with danazol appears to more than double the fertility rate.

Topics

endometriosis ovulatory dysfunction, luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome, LUF syndrome endometriosis, mild endometriosis anovulation, danazol ovulation induction, endometriosis ovulation problems, stage 1 endometriosis fertility, endometriosis clomiphene response, danazol fertility treatment, endometriosis ovulation induction success, luteinized unruptured follicle, minimal endometriosis infertility mechanism

Cite this article

Dmowski, W. P., Radwanska, E., Binor, Z., & Rana, N. (1986). Mild endometriosis and ovulatory dysfunction: effect of danazol treatment on success of ovulation induction. *Fertility and sterility*, *46*(5), 784-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49811-0

Related articles