Methods used to self-predict ovulation. A comparative study

  • Marquette University ROR

Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing : JOGNN, 19(3), 233-237

DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01642.x PMID 2358920

Abstract

Time of ovulation as detected by a self-test of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the urine was compared with time of ovulation as detected by self-observation of cervical mucus. Twenty regularly cycling women monitored their cervical mucus and urine LH for two complete menstrual cycles. Of the cycles that had an LH surge, 100% were on the peak day of cervical mucus or within three days before the peak day. Self-observation of cervical mucus, therefore, can be an accurate method of determining optimal fertility.

Topics

Fehring cervical mucus ovulation prediction LH comparison, self-prediction ovulation cervical mucus LH urine test, peak day cervical mucus correlation LH surge, cervical mucus accuracy detecting optimal fertility, self-observation cervical mucus ovulation timing validation, urinary LH test versus mucus observation ovulation, natural family planning ovulation self-detection methods, billings ovulation method LH surge correlation, comparative study ovulation detection self-methods, fertility awareness cervical mucus peak day LH surge timing
PMID 2358920 2358920 DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01642.x 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01642.x

Cite this article

Fehring, R. J. (1990). Methods used to self-predict ovulation. A comparative study. *Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN*, *19*(3), 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01642.x

Related articles