Laparoscopy in the "normal" infertile patient: a question revisited

  • Pennsylvania Hospital ROR
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital ROR

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 7(3), 317-324

DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60473-2 PMID 10924624

Abstract

STUDY

Objective

To determine the prevalence of reproductive pathology in a group of infertile women thought to be at low risk for altered pelvic anatomy.

Design

Retrospective chart review and follow-up (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

Academic-affiliated, private reproductive endocrinology practice.

Patients

One hundred infertile women.

Intervention

Diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND

Main Results

Of 100 patients with a negative reproductive work-up up to the point of laparoscopy, 68 had pathology of reproductive

Significance

intrinsic tubal disease 24, peritubal adhesive disease 34, and endometriosis 43, some in combination. Laparoscopy was especially helpful in establishing treatment protocols for older women, who were referred for assisted reproductive techniques earlier than otherwise might have been the case. Women conceived after hormone therapy and after operative intervention. Although the hysterosalpingogram was read as normal in all women, tubal disease was diagnosed laparoscopically, independent of endometriosis, in 27 patients, with 2 having complete obstruction. Endometriosis stage I-II was found in 22 patients, stage III in 13, and stage IV in 6.

Conclusion

Even in women thought to be at low risk for significant pelvic pathology affecting reproduction, the yield was high. Although some pregnancies were achieved after operative intervention, frequently laparoscopy was helpful in making a decision to go to assisted reproductive technology, particularly when infertility had been of long duration and in older women. Frequently the degree of pathology was such that a full operating suite was necessary to provide adequate instrumentation and anesthesia for operative intervention, which would not have been the case with office laparoscopy.

Topics

laparoscopy normal infertile patient unexplained infertility prevalence pathology, diagnostic laparoscopy unexplained infertility endometriosis tubal disease, infertility workup normal HSG laparoscopy pelvic pathology yield, Corson unexplained infertility laparoscopy reproductive pathology, peritubal adhesions endometriosis laparoscopic diagnosis infertile women, hysterosalpingogram false negative tubal disease laparoscopy findings, laparoscopy vs assisted reproduction unexplained infertility treatment decision, stage III IV endometriosis unexpected finding diagnostic laparoscopy, retrospective chart review infertility laparoscopy low risk women, operative laparoscopy infertility treatment older women ART referral
PMID 10924624 10924624 DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60473-2 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60473-2

Cite this article

Corson, S. L., Cheng, A., & Gutmann, J. N. (2000). Laparoscopy in the "normal" infertile patient: a question revisited. *The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists*, *7*(3), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60473-2

Related articles