Induced anovulation as treatment of premenstrual tension syndrome. A double-blind cross-over study with GnRH-agonist versus placebo

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 67(2), 159-166

DOI 10.3109/00016348809004191 PMID 3140572 Source

Abstract

A treatment with the GnRH-agonist, buserelin, was given intranasally in a dosage of 400 micrograms once daily, to induce anovulation in 26 women with premenstrual tension syndrome; 23 patients completed the study course. The design was double-blind and cross-over. Daily symptom ratings were made for two pretreatment, diagnostic cycles and continued for up to six cycles or 6 months. The rating scale used was an earlier described visual analogue scale. Blood samples for estradiol and progesterone radio-immunoassay were taken once weekly throughout the study. Results show beneficial effects of both placebo and GnRH-agonist, compared with the pretreatment situation. The GnRH-agonist was, however, significantly better than placebo. At the end of the treatment periods the patients while still taking placebo, still showed cyclical symptom changes, whereas during the GnRH-agonist treatment the cyclical changes had disappeared. The results indicate that a factor from the corpus luteum must be involved in the etiology of cyclical mood changes. The results also show that inhibition of ovulation by mean of GnRH-agonists is one possible way to treat premenstrual tension syndrome.

Topics

premenstrual syndrome corpus luteum, gnrh agonist pms treatment, induced anovulation premenstrual tension, luteal phase mood changes etiology, cyclical symptoms buserelin, ovarian hormone mood disorders, premenstrual dysphoric disorder physiology, progesterone mood cyclical changes, corpus luteum factor mood, ovulation suppression pms, luteal phase defect symptoms

Cite this article

Hammarbäck, S., & Bäckström, T. (1988). Induced anovulation as treatment of premenstrual tension syndrome. A double-blind cross-over study with GnRH-agonist versus placebo. *Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica*, *67*(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348809004191

Related articles