Inability of sonography to detect imminent ovulation

  • Medical College of Wisconsin ROR
  • Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 152(1), 91-95

DOI 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91 PMID 2642364

Abstract

Sonographic visualization of the cumulus oophorus or of morphologic alterations in the wall of the dominant follicle have been reported to be reliable signs of imminent ovulation when conventional transabdominal sonography is used. To determine if transvaginal sonography could allow a more frequent and confident prediction of imminent ovulation, we prospectively monitored 22 ovulatory menstrual cycles in four women undergoing artificial insemination and in 13 normally menstruating volunteers. Scanning was done on alternate days in the periovulatory period; a 7.5-MHz transvaginal transducer was used. Despite the improved resolution obtained with transvaginal sonography, confident identification of the cumulus oophorus or of mural changes in the follicle was not possible in any of the cycles followed. No other consistent follicular characteristic predicted imminent ovulation. We conclude that confident prediction of imminent ovulation is not possible with sonographic analysis.

Topics

transvaginal sonography ovulation prediction follicle morphology, cumulus oophorus ultrasound detection ovulation, dominant follicle wall changes imminent ovulation sonography, transvaginal ultrasound ovulation timing limitations, follicular monitoring transvaginal probe ovulatory cycle, sonographic signs imminent ovulation reliability, artificial insemination ultrasound follicle monitoring ovulation prediction, periovulatory follicle morphology ultrasound accuracy, mural changes dominant follicle transvaginal scanning, ovulation detection ultrasound negative predictive value
PMID 2642364 2642364 DOI 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91

Cite this article

Zandt-Stastny, D., Thorsen, M. K., Middleton, W. D., Aiman, J., Zion, A., McAsey, M. E., & Harms, L. (1989). Inability of sonography to detect imminent ovulation. *AJR. American journal of roentgenology*, *152*(1), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.152.1.91

Related articles