Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women

  • University of Calgary ROR
  • NeoFertility Clinic, Suite 7, 1st Floor, Beacon Mall, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland. Phil.Boyle@NeoFertility.ie. ROR
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon ROR
  • Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 ROR
  • University of Ottawa ROR
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ROR

Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 144

DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144 PMID 29881719

Abstract

Objective

Explore potential relationships between preovulatory, periovulatory, and luteal-phase characteristics in normally cycling women.

Design

Observational study.

Setting

Eight European natural family planning clinics. Patient(s): Ninety-nine women contributing 266 menstrual cycles. Intervention(s): The participants collected first morning urine samples that were analyzed for estrone-3 glucuronide (E1G), pregnanediol-3alpha-glucuronide (PDG), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH). The participants underwent serial ovarian ultrasound examinations. Main Outcome Measure(s): Four outcome measures were analyzed: short luteal phase, low mid-luteal phase PDG level (mPDG), normal then low luteal PDG level, low then normal luteal PDG level.

Results

A long preovulatory phase was a predictor of short luteal phase, with or without adjustment for other variables. A high periovulatory PDG level was a predictor for short luteal phase as well as normal then low luteal PDG level. A low periovulatory PDG level predicted low mPDG and low then normal luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. A small maximum follicle predicted normal then low luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. The relationship between small maximum follicle size and short luteal phase or small maximum follicle size and low mPDG was no longer present when the regression was adjusted for certain characteristics. A younger age at menarche and a high body mass index were both predictors of low mPDG.

Conclusion

Luteal phase abnormalities exist over a spectrum where some ovulation disorders may exist as deviations from the normal ovulatory process.This study confirms the negative impact of a small follicle size on the quality of the luteal phase. The occurrence of normal then low luteal PDG level is confirmed as a potential sign of luteal phase abnormality.

Topics

Abdulla Bouchard Leiva Boyle Ecochard hormonal predictors abnormal luteal phase, preovulatory periovulatory luteal-phase characteristics normally cycling women, estradiol progesterone LH luteal phase deficiency urinary hormone monitoring, short luteal phase inadequate progesterone peak day timing prediction, eight European NFP clinics 99 women observational ovulation cycle study, follicular phase estrogen surge luteal progesterone relationship prediction, Frontiers Public Health 2018 luteal phase abnormality hormonal predictors, pregnanediol glucuronide PDG estrone glucuronide E1G daily hormone profiles, abnormal luteal phase definition prevalence hormonal correlates natural cycles, Ecochard French CycloTest European multicenter NFP hormone monitoring study
PMID 29881719 29881719 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144

Cite this article

Abdulla, S. H., Bouchard, T. P., Leiva, R. A., Boyle, P., Iwaz, J., & Ecochard, R. (2018). Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women. *Frontiers in public health*, *6*, 144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144

Related articles