Home monitoring of uterine contractility. Summary of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health and Resources Development, Bethesda, Maryland, March 29 and 30, 1989

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 165(1), 2-6

DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90212-a PMID 1677235 Source

Abstract

At an interdisciplinary workshop on home monitoring of uterine activity, participants reviewed the basis of this technology and its use in the identification of women at high risk of preterm delivery and in the prevention of preterm birth. Although the guard-ring devices in current use appear capable of detecting uterine activity, they do not clearly distinguish between Braxton Hicks contractions and the contractions of early labor. There was agreement that women destined for preterm delivery have more uterine activity on average than do other women of comparable gestational age but that there is substantial overlap between the two groups. Thus it is uncertain whether this difference can be used effectively for screening purposes. Conferees agreed that there is considerable evidence that twice-daily monitoring of very-high-risk women, in conjunction with daily nursing support and high-quality obstetric care, may prevent preterm births. Available evidence does not clearly distinguish the contribution of tocodynamometry from that of nursing support. A number of areas were identified in which further research is needed.

Topics

home uterine monitoring preterm labor, tocodynamometry home use, uterine contraction monitoring devices, preterm birth prevention technology, home monitoring uterine activity, braxton hicks vs labor contractions, nursing support preterm delivery, high risk pregnancy home monitoring, early labor detection methods, uterine activity screening preterm

Cite this article

Rhoads, G. G., McNellis, D. C., & Kessel, S. S. (1991). Home monitoring of uterine contractility. Summary of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health and Resources Development, Bethesda, Maryland, March 29 and 30, 1989. *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, *165*(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90212-a

Related articles