British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100(6), 516-523, 1993
Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage
I Chalmers, P. M. Dunn, K McPherson
James F. Pearson, R Peto, MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage , M. C. Macnaughton , Victor Dubowitz , Adrian Grant , A. C. Turnbull
To assess whether cervical cerclage in women deemed to be at increased risk of cervical incompetence prolongs pregnancy and thereby improves fetal and neonatal outcome.
Design
Multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Setting
Hospitals in the United Kingdom, France, Hungary, Norway, Italy, Belgium, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands and Canada.
Subjects
One thousand two hundred and ninety-two pregnant women whose obstetricians were uncertain whether to recommend cervical cerclage, most of whom had a history of early delivery or cervical surgery.
Interventions
Cervical cerclage was compared with a policy of withholding the operation unless it was considered to be clearly indicated.
Main Outcome Measures
Delivery before 33 completed weeks, preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), and vital status of the baby after completion of the pregnancy.
Results
The overall preterm delivery rate was 28%. There were fewer deliveries before 33 weeks in the cerclage group (83 (13%) compared with 110 (17%), P = 0.03) and this difference reflected deliveries characterised by features of cervical incompetence (painless cervical dilatation and prelabour rupture of the membranes). There was a corresponding difference in very low birthweight deliveries (63 (10%) compared with 86 (13%), P = 0.05). The difference in the overall rate of miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death (55 (9%) compared with 68 (11%)) was less marked and was not statistically significant. The use of cervical cerclage was associated with increased medical intervention and a doubling of the risk of puerperal pyrexia.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the operation had an important beneficial effect in 1 in 25 cases in the trial (95% confidence interval (CI) 1 in 12 to 1 in 300 sutures). Its use is associated with increased medical intervention and puerperal pyrexia. Nevertheless, this trial suggests that, on balance, cervical cerclage should be offered to women at high risk, such as those with a history of three or more pregnancies ending before 37 weeks gestation.
cervical cerclage randomized controlled trial preterm delivery, cervical incompetence cerclage pregnancy outcomes, cerclage versus no cerclage preterm birth prevention, MRC RCOG cervical cerclage multicentre trial 1993, cervical cerclage delivery before 33 weeks, painless cervical dilatation prelabour membrane rupture cerclage, cervical surgery history preterm delivery prevention, cerclage puerperal pyrexia complications, very low birthweight cerclage intervention, recurrent preterm birth cerclage efficacy, cervical incompetence surgical management pregnancy prolongation, cerclage number needed to treat preterm prevention
PMID 8334085 8334085 DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x
Cite this article
MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (1993). Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. *British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology*, *100*(6), 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x
MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(6):516-523. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x
MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. "Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage." *British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology*, vol. 100, no. 6, 1993, pp. 516-523.
Hilgers TW2000BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
This is the second edition of this guideline; the first edition was published in 2011 under the same name. It supplements NICE guideline NG25 Preterm labour and birth. Cerclage remains one of the stan...
Rush RW et al.1984British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
The effect of cervical suture on pregnancy outcome was studied in 194 women with a high risk (approximately 30%) of having a late abortion or a preterm delivery. The women were randomly allocated eith...
Baud O et al.1999British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
OBJECTIVES: To test the association between cytokine levels in the amniotic fluid and (i) the vascular invasion phase of intrauterine infection, (ii) the occurrence of periventricular leukomalacia; to...
Thorogood M et al.1999British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Objective: To examine the risk of multiple sclerosis in users of combined oral contraceptives.
Design: Cohort study conducted between 1968 and 1996 using diagnostic data supplied by general practition...