Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 123(5), 718-729, 2016
Abstract
To investigate perinatal outcomes associated with fertility treatments, including assisted reproductive technology (ART), intrauterine insemination with ovulation stimulation (IUI), and ovulation stimulation alone (OS).
Population-representative cross-sectional survey of women with live births, 2004-2008.
Florida, Maryland, and Utah, USA. SAMPLE: 21 803 women, weighted to represent 1 022 597 women.
Survey and birth certificate data were analysed with logistic regression models adjusted for age, education, race, income, and parity, using separate models for singletons and all births. We used two referent groups: (1) women who never used fertility treatment and (2) subfertile women conceiving without treatment.
Preterm birth (<37 weeks), very preterm birth (<34 weeks), low birthweight (<2500 g), and very low birthweight (<1500 g).
Referent group 1: In singletons, ART was associated with preterm birth (OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.74, 6.20) and low birthweight (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.99, 4.26). OS was also associated with low birthweight (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.19, 2.19). Including all births, treatment was associated with preterm birth and low birthweight: ART (OR 6.21; 95% CI 4.21, 9.16 and OR 6.51; 95% CI 4.85, 8.73); IUI (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.24, 3.56 and OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.54, 3.76); OS (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.01, 1.94 and OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.60, 2.75), respectively. Referent group 2: ART was associated with both outcomes in all births, but not singletons.
Preterm birth and low birthweight associated with fertility treatments are largely attributable to multiple gestation, but are also related to underlying subfertility. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Preterm birth is associated with subfertility, and with fertility treatments through multiple gestation.
Topics
Cite this article
Simonsen, S. E., Baksh, L., & Stanford, J. B. (2015). Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study. *BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology*, *123*(5), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13510
Simonsen SE, Baksh L, Stanford JB. Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2015;123(5):718-729. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13510
Simonsen, S. E., et al. "Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study." *BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology*, vol. 123, no. 5, 2015, pp. 718-729.
Keywords
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Florida, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Newborn, Infertility, Length of Stay, Logistic Models, Maryland, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Premature Birth, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Risk Factors, Utah, Intrauterine Insemination, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome Premature Birth, Reproductive Techniques-assisted