Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases

  • University of Southern California ROR
  • University of British Columbia ROR
  • Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Southern Medical Program, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada; Faculty of Health and Social Development, ...
  • Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre ROR
  • Department of Pathology, Southern Regional Area Health Education Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA. ROR
  • University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus ROR

Appetite, 216, 108314

DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314 PMID 41005066

Abstract

Background

Self-reported dietary intake varies across menstrual cycle phases, but objective assessments of dietary intake together with appetite and resting metabolic rate (RMR) are limited. This study aimed to assess differences in dietary intake, appetite, and RMR during two hormonally-distinct menstrual cycle phases in laboratory and free-living settings.

Methods

Healthy premenopausal females with predictable normal-length menstrual cycles completed two study visits: one in the late-follicular and one in the mid-luteal phase. Menstrual cycle phases were assessed using urinary luteinizing hormone surge and prospective cycle days. Participants consumed a 2-day energyand macronutrient-balanced run-in diet prior to each visit. RMR was measured with indirect calorimetry, followed by appetite ratings before and after a standardized breakfast, and a food cravings questionnaire. Appetite was also tracked for 2.5 days post-visit in a free-living environment. Ad libitum energy and macronutrient intakes were measured using pre-weighed plus weighing of uneaten food at an in-laboratory lunch meal, as well as during the 2.5-day free-living period.

Results

Eighteen participants were included (age: 21 ± 4 years; body mass index: 21.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2). There were no differences between in-laboratory ad libitum energy or macronutrient intakes, appetite, or food cravings between phases. RMR did not differ between phases, although the mid-luteal phase RMR tended to be higher (104 ± 218 kcal/day higher; P = 0.074). No main or interaction effects for phase or time were observed for free-living dietary intake nor appetite ratings.

Conclusions

Although RMR tended to be increased during the luteal phase, comprehensive appetite and energy intake assessments showed no significant cycle-phase differences in these 18 participants.

Topics

energy intake appetite menstrual cycle phase follicular luteal, Prior JC dietary intake menstrual cycle resting metabolic rate, food cravings menstrual cycle ovulatory women laboratory study, luteal phase resting metabolic rate increase premenopausal women, ad libitum energy intake menstrual cycle phase differences, menstrual cycle appetite free-living laboratory dietary assessment, macronutrient intake follicular versus luteal phase healthy women, indirect calorimetry menstrual cycle energy expenditure, urinary LH surge cycle phase verification dietary study, progesterone estrogen energy balance premenopausal females
PMID 41005066 41005066 DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314

Cite this article

Smith, M., Aghayan, M., Little, J., Prior, J. C., Cohen, T. R., Soon, Z., Bomide, H., & Purcell, S. (2026). Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases. *Appetite*, *216*, 108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314