For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.
endometriosis surgery restorative reproductive medicine debate, endometriosis surgery versus IVF infertility treatment, RRM endometriosis surgery claims evidence review, laparoscopic endometriosis surgery fertility restoration critique, endometriosis surgery indications infertility shared decision making, Humphries endometriosis surgery restorative reproductive medicine, personhood movement IVF restriction endometriosis surgery, endometriosis root cause treatment natural fertility claims, endometriosis surgery limitations assisted reproductive technology, religious political influence endometriosis treatment policy
PMID 41411651 41411651 DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151
Dahlke JD et al., 2020
Open Access
Obstetrics and Gynecology
In this Commentary, we explain the case for a standardized cesarean delivery surgical technique. There are three strong arguments for a standardized approach to cesarean delivery, the most common majo...
Perinatal palliative care refers to a coordinated care strategy that comprises options for obstetric and newborn care that include a focus on maximizing quality of life and comfort for newborns with a...
Although numerous studies have addressed the safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraceptive use in healthy women, data regarding women with underlying medical conditions or other special circumsta...
Contraception/Comparison > Guidelines > Medical Eligibility CriteriaContraception/Comparison > Safety > Coexisting Medical ConditionsGeneral OB/GYN > Clinical Guidelines > ACOG Practice Bulletins
Peragallo Urrutia R et al., 2018Obstetrics and Gynecology
OBJECTIVE: To summarize best available prospective data on typical and perfect use effectiveness of fertility awareness-based methods for avoiding pregnancy.
DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic r...