Efficacy of human menopausal gonadotropins as therapy for abnormal cervical mucus

Fertility and sterility, 51(1), 58-62

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60428-4 PMID 2535987 Source

Abstract

Traditional therapies for abnormal cervical mucus, other than timed intrauterine insemination, are noteworthy for being ineffectual. Patients (n = 27) with documented abnormal Insler scores in repetitive cycles and failure to conceive with traditional treatments were screened with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) for estrogen responsiveness of the cervix. Only 5 patients were found unresponsive. Seventeen patients with CEE-responsive cervices then were treated with human gonadotropins (hMG), initially 1 ampule days 5 to 11. If the mucus failed to improve, the hMG was increased to standard doses. Eight patients responded to 1 ampule hMG with improved mucus and conception. The remainder required 2 ampules hMG. In patient cycles with corrected cervical mucus, the viable fecundibility (fv) was 0.35. This is significantly higher than predicted for this population (fv = 0.09; P less than 0.01). In all, 14 of 17 patients conceived viable pregnancies during hMG treatment. It is concluded that graduated hMG is efficacious in treating patients with abnormal cervical mucus responsive to CEE. It is preferable to either in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer, based on both cost and efficacy for most patients.

Topics

cervical mucus infertility treatment, abnormal cervical mucus therapy, human menopausal gonadotropins cervical factor, insler score cervical mucus assessment, hostile cervical mucus gonadotropin therapy, cervical factor infertility hmg treatment, cervical mucus quality ovulation induction, estrogen responsive cervical mucus, biomarker-guided infertility treatment, cervical mucus fertility evaluation

Cite this article

Soto-Albors, C., Daly, D. C., & Ying, Y. K. (1989). Efficacy of human menopausal gonadotropins as therapy for abnormal cervical mucus. *Fertility and sterility*, *51*(1), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60428-4

Related articles