Effect of progesterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on normal corpus luteum function

  • University of South Alabama ROR
  • Johns Hopkins University ROR

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118(4), 466-472

DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33685-7 PMID 4812567

Abstract

A group of infertility patients were evaluated by an endometrial biopsy, timed with a basal body temperature chart, serum luteinizing hormone radioimmunassay to pinpoint ovulation, and daily serum progesterone values during a control and a treatment cycle. Progesterone in the suppository or intramuscular form and 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate* were administered during the luteal phase to a group of volunteer patients with normal corpus luteum function to determine if these compounds would depress serum progesterone levels as do certain progestational agents. There was no apparent inhibition of corpus luteum function as no decrease in progesterone production occurred. Despite the additive effect of progesterone administration demonstrated by elevated serum levels, endometrial biopsies remained in phase when dated from the estimated day of ovulation.

Topics

progesterone supplementation corpus luteum function effect, 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate luteal phase support, Aksel Jones progesterone corpus luteum suppression, exogenous progesterone endogenous corpus luteum inhibition, progesterone suppository intramuscular luteal phase endometrial biopsy, progestational agents corpus luteum function safety, serum progesterone additive effect exogenous administration, endometrial biopsy dating progesterone supplementation normal, luteal support progesterone infertility patients normal cycle, progesterone treatment no corpus luteum suppression evidence
PMID 4812567 4812567 DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33685-7 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33685-7

Cite this article

Aksel, S., & Jones, G. S. (1974). Effect of progesterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on normal corpus luteum function. *American journal of obstetrics and gynecology*, *118*(4), 466-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33685-7

Related articles