Current practice in tubal surgery and adhesion management: a review

Reproductive biomedicine online, 23(1), 53-62

DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.018 PMID 21550854 Source

Abstract

The diminished role of tubal surgery in infertile women following widespread access to IVF is now being reviewed as more patients and surgeons today consider tubal surgery as an effective alternative to assisted reproduction treatment in certain circumstances. The limitations of and lack of patient acceptance of assisted reproduction treatment for ethical and moral reasons have contributed to this change as well as advances in surgical techniques and instrument technology, notably developments in endoscopic surgery. Strategies in tubal surgery are largely unchanged but the mini-invasive nature of the endoscopic approach has added value because of less tissue trauma, better visualization of the operative field and more rapid healing, which make surgery using today's techniques an integral part of the treatment strategy in infertile couples.

Topics

tubal surgery infertility, adhesion prevention fallopian tubes, laparoscopic tubal repair, minimally invasive tubal surgery, tubal microsurgery outcomes, alternative to ivf tubal factor, endoscopic fertility surgery, fallopian tube reconstruction, surgical restoration fertility, tubal adhesiolysis techniques

Cite this article

watrelot, A., & Chauvin G (2011). Current practice in tubal surgery and adhesion management: a review. *Reproductive biomedicine online*, *23*(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.018

Related articles