Comparison of five clomiphene citrate dosage regimens: follicular recruitment and distribution in the human ovary

Fertility and sterility, 52(4), 560-563

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60963-9 PMID 2680615 Source

Abstract

One hundred fifty-six women with cycle disorders presenting as absence or infrequency of ovulation and with luteal phase deficiency (group II, according to the World Health Organization classification) received clomiphene citrate (CC) for ovulation induction. The administered dosage ranged from 50 to 250 mg/d. The follicular development in terms of numbers of small (less than 8 mm), intermediate (9 to 15 mm), and large (greater than 15 mm) follicles and their distribution in either one or both ovaries on the day of assumed ovulation was related to the dosage of CC. A statistically significant increase was found in the total number of follicles in relation to the dosage of CC (P less than 0.003). In view of the development of the mature follicles, the gradual increase in CC daily dosage was thought to be associated with additional mature follicles before ovulation. However, this increased follicular recruitment was not regarded as statistically significant. Treatment with low doses of CC resulted in follicular development in only one ovary, whereas increased follicular recruitment after high CC dosage was found in association with follicular development in both ovaries.

Topics

clomiphene citrate dosing, ovulation induction protocol, follicular recruitment clomid, clomiphene 50mg vs 250mg, ovarian response clomiphene, bilateral follicular development, ultrasound monitoring ovulation induction, anovulation clomiphene treatment, luteal phase deficiency clomid, follicle size ovulation, WHO group 2 anovulation, clomid dosage comparison

Cite this article

Shalev, J., Goldenberg, M., Kukia, E., Lewinthal, D., Tepper, R., Mashiach, S., & Blankstein, J. (1989). Comparison of five clomiphene citrate dosage regimens: follicular recruitment and distribution in the human ovary. *Fertility and sterility*, *52*(4), 560-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60963-9

Related articles