Natural family planning (NFP) methods are effective for contraception with proper and consistent use. However, only 1% of patients at federally funded Title X family planning clinics select NFP as a contraceptive method. The goal of this study was to understand from clinicians' perspectives the barriers and facilitators to providing NFP methods.
Methods
Six telephone focus groups were conducted with 29 clinicians from Title X clinics across the United States and Puerto Rico. A hermeneutic method was used to analyze data for related themes.
Results
The overarching theme from the study was that participants had a strong desire to teach their patients how their bodies work and to empower them to learn to control fertility. Four subthemes emerged: patient misinformation and misunderstanding about fertility; provider ideas about ideal types of candidates for NFP; inconsistent patient teaching strategies; and lack of time to teach NFP methods.
Discussion
There is a need for increased NFP training for providers and efficient NFP patient teaching strategies to meet the needs of patients with limited knowledge about fertility.
natural family planning Title X clinics clinician perceptions, NFP barriers facilitators family planning provider perspectives, clinician attitudes natural family planning federally funded clinics, fertility awareness methods provider training patient education, Title X clinic NFP contraceptive method selection barriers, natural family planning patient teaching strategies empowerment, focus group study clinician NFP provision challenges, body literacy fertility education underserved women clinics, provider knowledge gaps natural family planning methods, Kelly Witt NFP Title X clinician focus groups
PMID 22251910 22251910 DOI 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00107.x 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00107.x
Cite this article
Kelly, P. J., Witt, J., McEvers, K., Enriquez, M., Abshier, P., Vasquez, M., & McGee, E. (2012). Clinician perceptions of providing natural family planning methods in Title X funded clinics. *Journal of midwifery & women's health*, *57*(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00107.x
Kelly PJ, Witt J, McEvers K, Enriquez M, Abshier P, Vasquez M, et al. Clinician perceptions of providing natural family planning methods in Title X funded clinics. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(1):35-42. doi:10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00107.x
Kelly, Patricia J., et al. "Clinician perceptions of providing natural family planning methods in Title X funded clinics." *Journal of midwifery & women's health*, vol. 57, no. 1, 2012, pp. 35-42.
Keywords
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Continuing, Family Planning Services/economics/methods, Female, Fertility, Financing, Government, Focus Groups, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Natural Family Planning Methods, Patient Education As Topic/methods, Puerto Rico, Sex Education/economics/methods, United States
Fehring RJ et al., 2015Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Introduction: The length of periodic abstinence, due to overestimation of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle, is often a cause for dissatisfaction, discontinuation, and user error with natural f...
Fehring RJ, 2005Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Calendar-based methods are not usually considered effective or useful methods of family planning among health professionals. However, new "high-" and "low"-tech calendar methods have been developed, w...
Fehring RJ et al., 2001Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
The purpose of this study was to describe and assess certified nurse-midwives' (CNMs) knowledge and promotion of two modalities for child spacing, natural family-planning (NFP) and the lactational ame...
Body Literacy > Education > Healthcare Provider KnowledgeFertility Awareness > Clinical Practice > Provider Promotion of NFPPostpartum > Lactational Amenorrhea > Child Spacing Methods