beta-mimetics have been prescribed by physicians to arrest or prevent premature labor for more than 20 years. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for tocolytic use, terbutaline sulfate has been the most widely prescribed beta-mimetic in the United States. Recently, the role of terbutaline in the treatment and prevention of preterm labor has been questioned by the FDA. Because the off-label use of drugs is a formally accepted practice in medicine when scientific studies support such use, we reviewed the currently available clinical literature on terbutaline use in various routes of delivery: intravenous, oral, and subcutaneous via infusion pump. This review describes the clinical evidence that supports the safe and effective use of terbutaline as a tocolytic agent in certain patient populations. Practicing physicians should continue to have unrestricted use of terbutaline for tocolysis as one of the few remaining therapeutic options remaining in the fight against preterm birth.
PMID 9812326 9812326 DOI 10.1097/00006254-199811002-00001 10.1097/00006254-199811002-00001
Cite this article
Lam, F., Elliott, J., Jones, J. S., Katz, M., Knuppel, R. A., Morrison, J., Newman, R., Phelan, J., & Willcourt, R. (1998). Clinical issues surrounding the use of terbutaline sulfate for preterm labor. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 53(11 Suppl), S85-S95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199811002-00001
Lam F, Elliott J, Jones JS, Katz M, Knuppel RA, Morrison J, et al. Clinical issues surrounding the use of terbutaline sulfate for preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53(11 Suppl):S85-S95. doi:10.1097/00006254-199811002-00001
Lam, F., et al. "Clinical issues surrounding the use of terbutaline sulfate for preterm labor." Obstetrical & gynecological survey, vol. 53, no. 11 Suppl, 1998, pp. S85-S95.
Keywords
Administration, Oral, Adrenergic beta-Agonists/administration & Dosage/adverse Effects/therapeutic Use, Drug Approval, Female, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Obstetric Labor, Premature/drug Therapy, Pregnancy, Terbutaline/administration & Dosage/adverse Effects/therapeutic Use, Tocolytic Agents/administration & Dosage/adverse Effects/therapeutic Use, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Tocolytic Agents, Terbutaline
To compare the efficacy of intravaginal and intrarectal plus oral indomethacin for the treatment of preterm labor. Between December 1996 and November 1998, 46 eligible gravidas admitted with singleton pregnancies and idiopathic preterm labor before 33 gestational weeks were randomized to receive 200 mg of intravaginal or intrarectal plus oral indomethacin. Twenty-three subjects were allocated to each study group. The interval from initiation of treatment to delivery was significantly longer in the intravaginal indomethacin group (26.5 +/- 5.7 versus 12.6 +/- 3.7 days; P =.007). Delivery was delayed by more than 7 days in 18 of 23 subjects (78%) in the intravaginal indomethacin group compared with ten (43%) in the intrarectal plus oral indomethacin group (P =.03). Birth weights were significantly higher (2306 +/- 436 versus 1862 +/- 232 g; P =.002) and hospitalization in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (3.1 +/- 0.8 versus 9.3 +/- 3. 7 days; P =.001) and mechanical ventilation (1.4 +/- 0.2 versus 5.3 +/- 1.6 days; P =.001) were significantly shorter in the intravaginal indomethacin group. Intravaginal indomethacin is more effective than intrarectal plus oral application in delaying preterm labor and is associated with higher birth weights, shorter NICU stays, and shorter intervals of mechanical ventilation.
To examine the effectiveness of any tocolytic compared with a placebo or no tocolytic for preterm labor. We checked MEDLINE (1966-1998) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for articles, using the search terms "randomized controlled trial" (RCT), "preterm labor," "tocolysis," "betamimetics," "ritodrine," "terbutaline," "hexaprenaline," "isoxuprine," "prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors," "indomethacin," "sulindac," "calcium channel blockers," "nifedipine," "oxytocin receptor blockers," "atosiban," "nitroglceride," and "magnesium sulfate." We included all RCTs that compared effect of a tocolytic with a placebo or no tocolytic in women in preterm labor, and reported perinatal, neonatal, or maternal outcomes. Studies were excluded if loss to follow-up exceeded 20% of those originally enrolled, or if data were not reported on a per-patient-treated basis. Eighteen of 76 articles retrieved met the inclusion criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, Two authors independently reviewed the articles and abstracted the data. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were done for each outcome for all trials and for specific types of tocolytic therapy when possible. Tocolytics decreased the risk of delivery within 7 days (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38, 0.95). Betamimetics, indomethacin, atosiban, and ethanol, but not magnesium sulfate, were associated with significant prolongations in pregnancy. Tocolytics were not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Maternal side effects significantly associated with tocolytic use were palpitations, nausea, tremor, chorioamnionitis, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, and need to discontinue treatment. Although tocolytics prolong pregnancy, they have not been shown to improve perinatal or neonatal outcomes and have adverse effects on women in preterm labor.
Gelbaya TA et al., 2014·Obstetrical & gynecological survey
The diagnosis of unexplained infertility can be made only after excluding common causes of infertility using standard fertility investigations,which include semen analysis, assessment of ovulation, and tubal patency test. These tests have been selected as they have definitive correlation with pregnancy. It is estimated that a standard fertility evaluation will fail to identify an abnormality in approximately 15% to 30% of infertile couples. The reported incidence of such unexplained infertility varies according to the age and selection criteria in the study population. We conducted a review of the literature via MEDLINE. Articles were limited to English-language, human studies published between 1950 and 2013. Since first coined more than 50 years ago, the term unexplained infertility has been a subject of debate. Although additional investigations are reported to explain or define other causes of infertility, these have high false-positive results and therefore cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Couples with unexplained infertility might be reassured that even after 12 months of unsuccessful attempts, 50% will conceive in the following 12 months and another 12% in the year after.
EndometriosisHormonal MechanismsEndometriosis Associated InfertilityHyperprolactinemia and Endometriosis
This review will address the current understanding of the relationship between prolactin (PRL) and endometriosis-associated infertility. Although the exact mechanisms of action of hyperprolactinemia in patients with endometriosis-associated infertility have not been clearly established, this report reviews results from relevant studies in the literature. These include serum PRL levels in endometriosis-associated infertility, PRL receptors in ectopic endometriotic tissues, basal PRL levels after TSH and Danazol (isoxazolic derivative of the synthetic steroid 5alpha-ethinyl-testosterone) therapy, peritoneal fluid and nocturnal serum PRL levels in endometriosis, infertility, and luteal phase PRL concentrations in patients with endometriosis. Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain the relationship between prolactinand endometriosis-associated infertility, relate endometriosis with infertility, and summarize two ways in which prolactin and endometriosis may be linked in the pathophysiology of infertility.