Clinical evaluation of luteal function

Obstetrics and gynecology, 84(2), 219-221

PMID 8041533 Source

Abstract

Objective

To determine the ability of luteal phase length determined by basal body temperature (BBT) pattern and a midluteal serum progesterone level to predict the result of an endometrial biopsy in a subsequent cycle.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 141 women with a history of infertility who were being evaluated for luteal function. The luteal phase length determined from a BBT chart of one menstrual cycle was compared to a single midluteal serum progesterone level from a second menstrual cycle. These findings were compared to a luteal phase endometrial biopsy performed in a third menstrual cycle. Subjects were divided into four groups depending upon luteal phase length (normal 11 or more days) and serum progesterone level (normal at least 10 ng/mL). The four groups were designated "normal," "short luteal phase," "low progesterone," and "abnormal," depending upon the results of the two tests. The frequency of in- and out-of-phase endometrial biopsy results in the four groups was compared.

Results

There was no difference in the occurrence of an in- or out-of-phase endometrial biopsy when the four groups were compared.

Conclusion

Neither luteal phase length nor a single midluteal serum progesterone level was predictive of subsequent in-phase or out-of-phase endometrial biopsy.

Topics

luteal phase defect diagnosis, basal body temperature luteal phase, midluteal progesterone level, endometrial biopsy luteal function, luteal phase length assessment, progesterone testing infertility, bbt chart luteal phase evaluation, out of phase endometrial biopsy, luteal phase infertility workup, progesterone level prediction endometrial dating, short luteal phase diagnosis

Cite this article

Nakajima, S. T., Molloy, M. H., Oi, R. H., Ohlson, K. A., Azevedo, R. A., & Boyers, S. P. (1994). Clinical evaluation of luteal function. *Obstetrics and gynecology*, *84*(2), 219-221.

Related articles