The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 2004

Chapter 89: Research End-notes

Thomas W Hilgers , M.D.

Author affiliations
  • Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Omaha, Nebraska. ROR

Abstract

A comprehensive, thematically organized compendium of citations documents the evidentiary foundations for every clinical protocol and outcome claim presented across the preceding 88 chapters, spanning foundational cervical mucus research through contemporary reproductive endocrinology and surgical outcomes literature. Consolidating this reference architecture in a dedicated chapter provides practitioners and researchers a structured pathway to primary literature, reinforcing that NaProTECHNOLOGY is grounded in a reproducible, peer-reviewed evidence base rather than institutional convention.

Topics

how much research supports NaProTechnology, is the Creighton Model scientifically validated, limitations of NaProTechnology research, are randomized controlled trials always the best evidence in reproductive medicine, why is natural fertility method research ignored, double standard evidence oral contraceptives vs natural fertility methods, evidence base for restorative reproductive medicine, history of the Pope Paul VI Institute research program

Related articles