The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 677-696, 2004

Chapter 51: Effectiveness of NaProTECHNOLOGY

Thomas W Hilgers

Author affiliations
  • Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Omaha, Nebraska. ROR
Read at source

Abstract

Cumulative pregnancy and live birth data from the Pope Paul VI Institute document NaProTECHNOLOGY outcomes across diagnostic categories including unexplained infertility, endometriosis, PCOD, and tubal disease, with multi-year follow-up that captures pregnancies occurring after continued treatment — a metric not captured in per-cycle ART statistics. These outcomes provide the evidence base for positioning NaProTECHNOLOGY as a first-line rather than last-resort reproductive medicine strategy.

Topics

how effective is NaProTechnology for infertility, NaProTechnology vs IVF success rates per woman, per woman pregnancy rate vs per cycle IVF comparison, IVF discontinuation rate by third cycle, NaProTechnology endometriosis pregnancy outcomes, does mucus cycle pattern predict fertility, fecundability rate NaProTechnology vs IVF, NaProTechnology multiple pregnancy rate compared to IVF

Cite this article

Hilgers, T. W. (2004). Chapter 51: Effectiveness of NaProTECHNOLOGY. *The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY*, 677-696.

Related articles