Chapter 16: Measuring Effectiveness and Pregnancy Rates of the CrMS

The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 215-230

Source

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

measuring effectiveness of natural family planning, creighton model pregnancy rates, natural family planning effectiveness studies, how effective is creighton model, avoiding pregnancy with fertility awareness, achieving pregnancy with fertility awareness, behavioral vs intentional pregnancy classification, method-related pregnancy rate, use-related pregnancy rate, achieving-related pregnancy definition, life table analysis for fertility methods, perfect use vs typical use effectiveness, unintended pregnancy categorization problems, discontinuation rates natural family planning, pregnancy evaluation creighton model, infertility exclusion criteria effectiveness studies, statistical methods measuring pregnancy rates, pearl rate calculation fertility methods, gross vs net life table rates, cycle-by-cycle use assessment fabm, confidence intervals pregnancy rate studies, avoiding-related method-consistent use, teaching-related pregnancy classification, comparing creighton to other nfp methods, cost-effectiveness natural family planning, reproductive category effectiveness breakdown, standardized nfp effectiveness reporting, couple-based fertility assessment

Cite this article

Stanford, J. B. (2004). Chapter 16: Measuring Effectiveness and Pregnancy Rates of the CrMS. *The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY*, 215-230.

Related articles