Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment
J Brent Richards, William D Leslie, Kerry Siminoski
David A Hanley, Jonathan D Adachi, S. Morin , Robert G Josse, Jerilynn C Prior, Alan Tenenhouse , David Goltzman, CaMos Study Group , Alexandra Papaioannou, J P Brown, K Shawn Davison, Lawrence Joseph
The impact of clinical risk factor-based absolute risk methods on the prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture is unknown. We applied absolute risk methods to 6646 subjects and found that the prevalence of elderly women deemed to be at high risk increased substantially, whereas the overall prevalence was highly dependent on the threshold used to designate high risk.
Introduction
Many groups have advocated using absolute risk methods that incorporate clinical risk factors to target patients for osteoporosis therapy. We examined how the application of such absolute risk classification systems influences the prevalence of those considered to be at high risk for osteoporotic fracture and compared these systems to one based solely on BMD.
Materials and Methods
Using 6646 subjects from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), a prospective, randomly selected, population-based cohort, we assessed three different systems for determining prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture: a BMD-based system; a simplified risk factor system incorporating age, sex, BMD, and two clinical risk factors; and a comprehensive system, incorporating age, sex, BMD, and seven clinical risk factors. The 10-year absolute risks of incident fragility fracture were compared across systems using three different high-risk thresholds.
Results
The prevalence of a T score < or = -2.5 was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.7-19.9%) in women and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.0-4.7%) in men. Using a 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold, the prevalence of women at high risk increased to 46.9% (95% CI: 45.4-48.4) and 42.5% (95% CI: 41.1-43.9) when the comprehensive and simplified risk factor classification systems were used, respectively. Using a 25% 10-year absolute risk threshold, the prevalence of high risk was similar to that of the BMD-based system, whereas the 20% threshold gave intermediate rates. All thresholds analyzed resulted in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk for fracture, whereas only the 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold resulted in an increase in the prevalence of men at high risk.
Conclusions
The application of risk factor-based systems results in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk. The prevalence of individuals at high risk may increase with changes to the methods used to determine those who are eligible for therapy. These data have important implications for the pattern of care and costs of treating osteoporotic fractures.
osteoporosis prevalence absolute fracture risk assessment methods, BMD T-score versus clinical risk factor fracture prediction, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study CaMos fracture risk, Prior JC osteoporosis risk classification systems, 10-year absolute fracture risk threshold prevalence, bone mineral density clinical risk factors elderly women, population-based cohort osteoporosis screening methods, Richards Leslie Goltzman osteoporosis prevalence assessment, fracture risk threshold treatment eligibility elderly, age sex BMD clinical risk factor osteoporosis classification
PMID 17129177 17129177 DOI 10.1359/jbmr.061109 10.1359/jbmr.061109
Cite this article
Richards, J. B., Leslie, W. D., Joseph, L., Siminoski, K., Hanley, D. A., Adachi, J. D., Brown, J. P., Morin, S., Papaioannou, A., Josse, R. G., Prior, J. C., Davison, K. S., Tenenhouse, A., Goltzman, D., & CaMos Study Group (2007). Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 22(2), 228-234. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061109
Richards JB, Leslie WD, Joseph L, Siminoski K, Hanley DA, Adachi JD, et al. Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(2):228-234. doi:10.1359/jbmr.061109
Richards, J. B., et al. "Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment." Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 22, no. 2, 2007, pp. 228-234.
Related articles
Bone HealthMedication-Induced Bone LossDrug Side Effects on BoneProspective Cohort Study
Depression and osteoporotic fractures are common ailments among elderly persons. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently used in the treatment of depression in this population, and the association between daily SSRI use and fragility fractures is unclear. Our objective was to examine the effect of daily SSRI use on the risk of incident clinical fragility fracture. A population-based, randomly selected, prospective cohort study of 5008 community-dwelling adults 50 years and older, followed up over 5 years for incident fractures. Clinical fragility fractures were classified as minimal trauma fractures that were clinically reported and radiographically confirmed. The risk of fragility fracture associated with daily SSRI use was determined while controlling for relevant covariates. Daily SSRI use was reported by 137 subjects. After adjustment for many potential covariates, daily SSRI use was associated with substantially increased risk of incident clinical fragility fracture (hazard rate, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.4). Daily SSRI use was also associated with increased odds of falling (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.5), lower bone mineral density at the hip, and a trend toward lower bone mineral density at the spine. These effects were dose dependent and were similar for those who reported taking SSRIs at baseline and at 5 years' follow-up. Daily SSRI use in adults 50 years and older remained associated with a 2-fold increased risk of clinical fragility fracture after adjustment for potential covariates. Depression and fragility fractures are common in this age group, and the elevated risk attributed to daily SSRI use may have important public health consequences.
Contraception/ComparisonInfectious Disease RiskHIV AcquisitionProspective Cohort Study
Combined oral contraceptives (COC) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) are among the most widely used family planning methods; their effect on HIV acquisition is not known. To evaluate the effect of COC and DMPA on HIV acquisition and any modifying effects of other sexually transmitted infections. This multicenter prospective cohort study enroled 6109 HIV-uninfected women, aged 18-35 years, from family planning clinics in Uganda, Zimbabwe and Thailand. Participants received HIV testing quarterly for 15-24 months. The risk of HIV acquisition with different contraceptive methods was assessed (excluding Thailand, where there were few HIV cases). HIV infection occurred in 213 African participants (2.8/100 woman-years). Use of neither COC [hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.42] nor DMPA (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.89-1.78) was associated with risk of HIV acquisition overall, including among participants with cervical or vaginal infections. While absolute risk of HIV acquisition was higher among participants who were seropositive for herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) than in those seronegative at enrolment, among the HSV-2-seronegative participants, both COC (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.39-5.82) and DMPA (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.98-8.00) users had an increased risk of HIV acquisition compared with the non-hormonal group. No association was found between hormonal contraceptive use and HIV acquisition overall. This is reassuring for women needing effective contraception in settings of high HIV prevalence. However, hormonal contraceptive users who were HSV-2 seronegative had an increased risk of HIV acquisition. Additional research is needed to confirm and explain this finding.
Contraception/ComparisonHIV RiskSafety OutcomesProspective Cohort Study
Many women using hormonal contraceptives are also at risk of sexually transmitted HIV infection, but data are mixed on whether hormonal contraception increases women's risk of HIV. We investigated associations between HIV incidence and use of combined oral contraceptives (COC), norethindrone enanthate (NET-EN) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in a cohort of South African women. Participants were 4200 HIV-negative women aged 35-49 years enrolled into a cervical cancer screening trial. At enrollment, women were tested for sexually transmitted infections and reported on their sexual behaviour and contraceptive use. During the 24 months of follow-up, women reported on their sexual behaviours and contraceptive use and underwent repeat HIV testing. During the 5010 person-years of follow-up, 111 incident HIV infections were observed (HIV incidence, 2.2 infections/100 person-years). At enrollment, 21% of women reported using hormonal contraception, primarily DMPA (14% of all women) or NET-EN (5%). After adjusting for sexual risk behaviours and sexually transmitted infections, the incidence of HIV was similar among women using COC, NET-EN or DMPA compared with women not using any hormonal method [incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals, 0.65, 0.16-2.66; 0.79, 0.31-2.02 and 0.96, 0.58-1.59, respectively]. There was also no association between increased duration of DMPA use and HIV incidence (P-value for trend, 0.51). These findings contribute to the evidence from general population cohorts of women that hormonal contraceptive use is not associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition. Nonetheless, family planning services are an important venue for HIV prevention activities.
Bone HealthCognitive Decline AssociationMedication EffectsBias by Indication
We are grateful to Dr. Naharci for the interest in our study reporting the association between cognitive decline and bone loss and fracture risk. (1) We agree that bisphosphonates (BPs) have a proven effect on reducing bone loss and fracture risk. (2) Medication with anticholinergic (ACH) side effects may also affect cogni-tive function as well as propensity to fall and fracture, although these effects have not been demonstrated in all studies. (3) We did not include these medication classes in our models because in observational studies the relationship between medication and outcomes is likely driven by factors associated with medication use. This bias by indication can only be avoided by specific study design (ie, propensity score matching), which was beyond the scope of our study. (4) However, we have conducted additional analyses to determine the prevalence of BP and ACH medication in our cohort, the association between these medication classes and our study outcomes and the impact of the addition of these medication classes to our findings. BP and ACH use were self-reported and obtained by questionnaire at baseline, and years 5 and 10. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and cognitive function using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test during all clinical visits. Follow-up time for BMD