To assess the use of cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) in women trying to conceive and determine whether monitoring is associated with increased cycle-specific probability of conception (fecundability).
Design
Time-to-pregnancy cohort study.
Setting
Population-based cohort.
PATIENT(S): Three hundred thirty-one women trying to conceive, ages 30 to 44 years, without known infertility.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): CMM prevalence and fecundability.
RESULT(S): During the first cycle of the study, CMM was performed consistently (checked on >66% of pertinent cycle days) by 20 women (6%), inconsistently (34% to 66% of days) by 60 women (18%), infrequently (≤33% of days) by 73 women (22%), and not performed by 178 women (54%). Cycles in which CMM was consistently performed were statistically significantly more likely to result in conception after adjusting for age, race, previous pregnancy, body mass index, intercourse frequency, and urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) monitoring. Fecundability also increased with increasing consistency of CMM.
CONCLUSION(S): Among women trying to conceive, CMM is uncommon, but our study suggests that CMM-a free, self-directed method to determine the fertile window-is associated with increased fecundability independent of intercourse frequency or use of urinary LH monitoring.
PMID 23850303 23850303 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002
Cite this article
Evans-Hoeker, E., Pritchard, D. A., Long, D. L., Herring, A. H., Stanford, J. B., & Steiner, A. Z. (2013). Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive. *Fertility and sterility*, *100*(4), 1033-1038.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002
Evans-Hoeker E, Pritchard DA, Long DL, Herring AH, Stanford JB, Steiner AZ. Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):1033-1038.e1. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002
Evans-Hoeker, E., et al. "Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 100, no. 4, 2013, pp. 1033-1038.e1.
Keywords
Adult, Cervix Mucus/metabolism, Female, Fertility, Fertilization, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Models, Statistical, Ovulation Detection/statistics & Numerical Data, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Self Care/methods/statistics & Numerical Data, Time Factors, Time-to-Pregnancy, Cervical Mucus Monitoring, Conception, Fecundability, Fertile Window
Objective: To assess the effect of randomization to FertilityFriend.com, a mobile computing fertility-tracking app, on fecundability.
Design: Parallel non-blinded randomized controlled trial nested wi...
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the frequency of use of selected fertility awareness indicators and to assess their influence on fecundability.
DESIGN: Web-based prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Not applic...
Purdue-Smithe AC et al., 2022The American journal of clinical nutrition
Background: Caffeine is the most frequently used psychoactive substance in the United States and >90% of reproductive-age women report some amount of intake daily. Despite biological plausibility, pre...
Favaro C et al., 2021
Open Access
Journal of Women's Health (2002)
Background: Time to pregnancy (TTP) is a biomarker of fecundability and has been associated with behavioral and environmental characteristics; however, these associations have not been examined in a l...